Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Critical Review Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Critical Review Rubric
Rubric Code:
WX64473
By
AngelaI
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Critical Review
A (90-100)
(N/A)
B (80-89)
(N/A)
C 70-79)
(N/A)
D (60-69)
(N/A)
F (59-1)
(N/A)
Introduction and Argument
A (90-100)
The review possesses an inviting introduction that provides film and director name, previous films--if pertinent--and an argument that clearly states the author's sound, critical argument related to the film's merit.
B (80-89)
The review possesses an introduction that provides film and director name, previous films--if pertinent--and a sound argument related to the film's merit.
C 70-79)
The review possesses an introduction that may be vague in that it does not mention film and director name, previous films--if pertinent--and a general or vague argument about the film's merit.
D (60-69)
The review does not possess an introduction; does not mention film and director name, previous films--if pertinent; and has little to no sound argument related to the film's merit.
F (59-1)
The review possesses no discernible introduction and does not mention film and director name, previous films--if pertinent--or a sound argument about the film's merit.
Organization
A (90-100)
The entire review is organized logically according to the argument. All paragraphs are also organized logically.
B (80-89)
Most of the review is organized logically in accordance with the argument. Almost all paragraph are organized logically.
C 70-79)
Some of the review is organized logically in accordance with the argument. Likewise, only some paragraphs are organized logically.
D (60-69)
Few paragraphs are organized in accordance with the argument, and few are organized logically.
F (59-1)
There is little to no discernible logical organization in accordance with the author's argument, and few to no paragraphs are organized logically.
Examples
A (90-100)
The review references particular filmic elements from the film--cinematic, dramatic, and/or literary--as it makes its case. These examples are also accompanied by sophisticated commentary that connects back to the argument.
B (80-89)
The review references particular filmic elements from the film--cinematic, dramatic, and/or literary--as it makes its case. These examples are also accompanied by advanced commentary that almost always connects back to the argument.
C 70-79)
The review references some specific filmic elements from the film--cinematic, dramatic, and/or literary--as it makes its case. These examples are also accompanied by general commentary that attempts to connect back to the argument.
D (60-69)
The review fails to reference particular filmic elements from the film--cinematic, dramatic, and/or literary--as it makes its case. There is little to no commentary that connects back to the argument.
F (59-1)
The review neither references particular filmic elements from the film--cinematic, dramatic, and/or literary--as it makes its case nor does it provide commentary that connects back to the argument.
Sources
A (90-100)
The critical review correctly cites at least one other review of the film or another like it. This source is connected to the author's argument in some fashion, not merely dropped in for the assignment's sake.
B (80-89)
The critical review correctly cites at least one other review of the film or another like it. The author makes an attempt to connect the source to their argument in some fashion, not merely dropped in for the assignment's sake
C 70-79)
The critical review correctly cites at least one other review of the film or another like it. This source is only generally connected to the author's argument in some fashion and thus appears to be placed merely for sake of the assignment.
D (60-69)
The critical review does not cite or incorrectly cites at least one other review of the film or another like it. The source, if present, does not connect directly to the author's argument and therefore appears merely dropped in for the assignment's sake.
F (59-1)
The critical review does not cite at least one other review of the film or another like it.
Mechanics
A (90-100)
The review utilizes Standard English and correct formatting and documentation in MLA style. There are no errors in mechanics or usage.
The review reaches the appropriate length.
B (80-89)
The review possesses Standard English and correct formatting and documentation in MLA style. There may be 1-3 errors in mechanics or usage.
The review reaches the appropriate length.
C 70-79)
The review possesses Standard English and correct formatting and documentation in MLA style. There may be 3-5 errors in mechanics or usage.
The review reaches the appropriate length.
D (60-69)
The review possesses Standard English and correct formatting and documentation in MLA style. There are more than 5 errors in mechanics or usage.
The review reaches the appropriate length.
F (59-1)
The review possesses Standard English and correct formatting and documentation in MLA style. Major disruptions in comprehension occur as a result of errors in mechanics and usage.
The review reaches the appropriate length.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.