Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: S221 Research Paper Rubric

iRubric: S221 Research Paper Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
S221 Research Paper Rubric S221 Research Paper Rubric Human Growth and Development in Social Environment Rubric Code: WX64455 By suji2128 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Psychology Type: Assessment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Interview Assignment Rubric
	Inadequate 1 pts	Below Average 2 pts	Average 3 pts	Above Average 4 pts	Exceptional 5 pts
Description of Interview	Inadequate Fails to describe, omits or lacks all area	Below Average Briefly describes some areas but does not provide specifics	Average Describes all areas but lacks details, richness and keen observation	Above Average Describes and identifies all areas adequately with specifics and details	Exceptional ID and Provides all areas with specific robust details; Thinks critically to provide clear, coherent and logically organized description
Significant Events/Diversity	Inadequate Fails to cite significant events and issues related to diversity	Below Average Provides little information regarding significant events and diversity	Average Describes significant events and cites issues related to diversity	Above Average Describes significant event in detail and thinks critically regarding diversity issues	Exceptional ID all significant events discussed and provides comprehensive reflection of all areas of diversity (race, ethnicity, rurality, gender/sexual orientation, disability, social class)
ID Risks/ID Protection Factors	Inadequate Fails to cite any risks or protective factors	Below Average Cites either Risks or Protective factors but not both	Average Cites Risks and Protective Factors with adequate details but not how it interrelates to whole person	Above Average Cite all Risks and Protective Factors with specific detail with critical and creative link to whole person	Exceptional In depth ID and analysis of all risks and protective factors applied to whole person
ID Bio-Psycho-Socilal-Spiritual	Inadequate Fails to assess and cite Bio-Psycho-Social-Spiritual framework	Below Average Discusses some but not all four area of framework	Average Discusses all four areas but lacks details cited from text or class power points where applicable	Above Average Discusses all areas, cites details and provides adequate specifics, including intercultural, civic knowledge	Exceptional In depth exploration and citing of each category applicable, rich discussion of intellectual and civic knowledge, narratives include critical thinking
ID/Apply/Link Course Theories	Inadequate Fails to ID theory from course or mentions theory from course or mentions theory in name but does not fully ID/apply analysis	Below Average ID/Discusses theory but provides little connection to person	Average Provides adequate ID of theory, with examples that apply to person	Above Average Provides ID of more than one theory, and cites specific application to person	Exceptional Critical analysis of more than one theory, in-depth analysis that evidences expertise of theory and ability to apply to person and experience
ID/Apply/Link Course Theories	Inadequate Fails to ID theory from course or mentions theory in name but does not fully ID/apply analysis	Below Average ID/Discusses theory but provides little connection to person	Average Provides adequate ID of theory, with examples that apply to person	Above Average Provides ID of more than one theory, and cites specific application to person	Exceptional Critical analysis of more than one theory, in-depth analysis that evidences expertise of theory and ability to apply to person and personal experience
ID/Apply Address macro, mezzo,---	Inadequate Fails to address family, community, culture, and individual strengths or cites only some or Systems Theory incorrectly	Below Average ID/Discusses all but with little detail, specifics, or critical thinking provided	Average Adequately ID/Apply all three areas as well as individual strengths but lacks analysis or extensive literacy	Above Average ID/Apply fully with specific examples to person, integrates the analysis of Systems Theory	Exceptional Comprehensive application of all areas and strengths; applies Strengths Perspective and Systems Theory accurately, provides rich discussion and in depth analysis that evidences expertise of these concepts and frameworks
SQ Assessment	Inadequate Unable to assess or lacks assessment inquiry and analysis regarding individual process and functioning	Below Average Provides a thin discussion with no detail regarding individual developmental process and current functioning	Average Sufficiently assesses and applying gerontology theory to their analysis of process and functioning	Above Average Thinks critically and applies robust assessment of person’s process and functioning as well as applies Gerontology theory	Exceptional Critical, creative and in depth assessment analysis of process and functioning, accurate application of Strengths Perspective and Gerontology Theories, Intercultural and/or civic knowledge applied
Share what you learned	Inadequate Does not share anything learned or forgets to complete both parts of this reflection	Below Average Lists answers briefly but doesn’t provide details, critical thinking or personal experience	Average Adequately explains both parts and cites NASW but lacks in depth analysis, rich description	Above Average Provides in depth reasoning to all areas, applies particular NASW values/ethics with examples	Exceptional All areas involve in depth personal inquiry, intercultural knowledge is applied in a logically and organized narrative
Scholarly References	Inadequate Omits 5 references or cites less than 5	Below Average Provides 5 references but some are not scholarly or gov't, or they are old	Average Provides 5 current scholarly/gov’t ref., adequately cites and applies showing literacy, inquiry and analysis	Above Average Provides 5 current scholarly/gov’t ref., in depth literate analysis, and narrative demonstrates succinct organization	Exceptional Clearly Identifies and cites all 5 current scholarly/gov’t ref. into paper showing understanding of in depth analysis, evidences critical thinking and creative application to person
APA	Inadequate Omits APA or incorrectly applies APA format; or attempts citations and application, but does not follow APA	Below Average Many APA, spelling, punctuation, grammatical errors resulting in difficult reading. Errors are frequent	Average Most APA citations, grammar correct allowing effective reading of work but some errors	Above Average Few APA, punctuation, spelling, grammatical errors	Exceptional APA style correctly applied; work is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, grammatical errors

Subjects:

Psychology

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Psychology rubrics

More Assessment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16