- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Scoring Rubric for Character Analysis

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Scoring Rubric for Character Analysis Scoring Rubric for Character Analysis Rubric Code: WX46CCA By ctraxler1 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Reading Grade Levels: (none)

Enter rubric title
	4 (N/A)	3 (N/A)	2 (N/A)	1 (N/A)
Interpretation	4 Interpretation of the character is accurate and is based on logical and insightful textual references	3 Interpretation of the characer is accurate and based on logical textual references	2 Interpretation of the character is mostly accurate. Textual references may be based on insufficient textual references	1 Interpretation of the character is inaccurate and based on random textual references
Supporting Evidence	4 The evidence strongly and insightfully supports the interpretation. Evidence is clearly stated and citations to the text is included.	3 The evidence accurately supports the interpretation. Citations are included, but not always clearly connected to the interpretation	2 The evidence somewhat supports the interpretation. Citations are sometimes included to support the interpretation and connection to the interpertation is not always clear.	1 The evidence does not clearly support the interpretation. Citations are random or not included to support the interpretation
Organization of Ideas	4 Details are placed in a logical order and the way they are presented efectively keeps the interest of the reader.	3 Details are placed in a logical order, but the way in which they are presented / introduced sometimes makes the writing less interesitng.	2 Some details are not in a logical or expected order, and this distracts the reader.	1 Many details are not in a logical or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is organized
Mechanics	4 There are no spelling or punctuation errors present in paper. The paper is typed, double spaced and follows the format accurately.	3 There are few (three or less) errors in spelling, capitalization, and punctuation. The paper is typed, double spaced and follows the proper format.	2 There are more than three errors in spelling, capitalization, and punctuation. The presentation is legible and the format is somewhat evident.	1 There are many errors in spelling, capitalization, and punctuation. The paper is difficult to read and lacks the proper format.