Skip to main content
iRubric: Poetry Explication rubric

iRubric: Poetry Explication rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Poetry Explication 
Rubric Code: W222A3A
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Poetry Explication
  Excellent

2 pts

Good

1.75 pts

Fair

1.5 pts

Poor

1 pts

Unacceptable

0 pts

Thesis

Excellent

The paper has an excellent thesis. The thesis explains the poem in sophisticated terms, demonstrating an excellent understanding of the poem and advancing original thought about the poem and its meaning.
Good

The paper has a good thesis. The thesis explains the poem in competent terms, demonstrating a good understanding of the poem and advancing original thought about the poem and its meaning.
Fair

The paper has a basic thesis. The thesis explains the poem in basic terms, demonstrating a simplistic understanding of the poem.
Poor

The paper has a poor thesis. The thesis explains the poem in the most basic of terms, without any original thinking.
Unacceptable

The paper does not have a clear and compelling thesis. The thesis does not explain the poem.
Development and Thematic Discussion

Excellent

This paper presents an excellent understanding of the themes of the poem, and integrates those themes, demonstrating an excellent level of mastery over the poem's form, content, and meaning.
Good

This paper presents a good understanding of the themes of the poem and integrates those themes, demonstrating a good level of mastery over the poem's form, content, and meaning.
Fair

This paper presents a basic understanding of the themes in the poem.

Examination of form of the poem is
Poor

This paper misinterprets the major themes of the poem.

Very little close reading of poem's form as it relates to content.
Unacceptable

This paper does not discuss the major themes of the poem.
Line-by-Line Explication

Excellent

The paper has an excellent explication of the poem, explaining the meaning of the poem in sophisticated and interesting terms.

This explication is sophisticated and deep.
Good

This explication demonstrates a good understanding of the language of the poem, explaining the meaning of the poem in competent terms.

This explication is good overall, but lacks some depth and sophistication.
Fair

This explication demonstrates a basic understanding of the language of poetry. Form and meaning of the poem described in basic terms.

This explication lacks sophistication and depth.
Poor

The paper has a poor explication of the poem, explaining the meaning of the poem in basic terms that are sometimes confusing and lack coherence.

This explication lacks sophistication and depth.
Unacceptable

The paper does an unacceptable job of discussing the poem.
Organization

Excellent

The paper's overall organization is superior, and serves to strengthen the argument.

Paragraphs flow from an assertive topic sentence, and cohere throughout.
Good

The paper's overall organization is good, and serves to strengthen the argument.

Most paragraphs flow from an assertive topic sentence, and cohere throughout.
Fair

The paper's overall organization is adequate.

Some paragraphs are not cohesive, and/or lack clear, assertive topic sentence
Poor

There is some attempt at organization, but essay falls off-track.

Some paragraphs wander off topic or have weak topic sentences.
Unacceptable

The paper does not have any discernible organization.

Paragraphs wander off topic, without topic sentence.
Grammar & Mechanics

Excellent

This paper has been proofread and is flawless. There are no errors in grammar or mechanics.
Good

This paper has been proofread. There are very small errors in grammar and mechanics.
Fair

This paper has been proofread, however, there are errors in grammar and mechanics.
Poor

This paper has many errors in grammar and mechanics. The paper demonstrates poor control over academic American English.
Unacceptable

The paper has so many errors in grammar and mechanics that it lacks fluency.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16