Skip to main content
iRubric: PROJECT INTERVIEW rubric

iRubric: PROJECT INTERVIEW rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
PROJECT INTERVIEW 
PROJECT INTERVIEW
Work with a partner to write questions and answers for an interview with one of you being the interviewer and the other the main character. Dressing as the character is optional.
Rubric Code: VX346C4
By amiereker
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: K-5

Powered by iRubric Criteria for Interviewing Skills
  Very Good

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Introduction

Very Good

The interviewer introduced self and gave quality background information on the main character before introducing him/her.
Good

The interviewer introduced self and gave some background information on the main character before introducing him/her.
Fair

The interviewer did not introduce self and/or gave little background information on the main character before introducing him/her.
Poor

The interviewer did not introduce self and/or gave insufficient background information on the main character before introducing him/her.
Open Ended Questions

Very Good

Questions were reasonable and insightful. They covered all of the major events in the book.
Good

Questions led to discussion without "yes" or "no" answers. They covered the majority of the book from the beginning to end.
Fair

Most but not all questions were answered with "yes" or "no". They covered at least half of the information presented in the book, but could have done more.
Poor

Questions could be answered with a "yes" or "no". The interview was too short and missed a lot of the information presented in the text.
Social skills

Very Good

Interviewer was polite.
Interviewer did not speak too fast or too slowly.
Interviewer was attentive to the answers and questions of the person interviewed. Interview also used exceptional volume and clarity.
Good

Interviewer was polite.
Interviewer did not speak too fast or too slowly.
Interviewer was attentive to the answers and questions of the person interviewed. Good volume and clarity.
Fair

Interviewer paid some attention to the person interviewed, speech was sometimes too quiet or hard to understand, and/or the interviewer was impolite some of the time. Needed to be louder or speak more clearly.
Poor

Interviewer rushed through the interview, speech was difficult to hear or understand ,did not pay attention to the person interviewed, and/or was not polite to the person interviewed. Difficult to hear or understand.
Questions generated answers

Very Good

Exceptional questions and guiding questions. Obviously put a lot of thought and time into this project.
Good

Great questions and guiding questions were used to keep the main character talking.
Fair

Guiding questions were used but did not reflect the purposes of the interview
Poor

Interviewer got off track and didn't stay on the main ideas of the story.
Main Character

Very Good

Dressed/acted in character and was very responsive to the interviewer giving complete/accurate answers.
Good

Was in character but was a little vague with some of the answers. Elaborated on many of the answers.
Fair

Did not appear as the "main character" in dress or in voice.
Was not able to answer some of the questions.
Poor

Was not in character at all and was ill prepared to qive adequate answers. Needed to spend more time preparing.
Main Character Presence

Very Good

Main character was polite. He/She did not speak too fast or too slowly. He/She was attentive to the questions and used exceptional volume and clarity.
Good

Main characterwas polite. He/She did not speak too fast or too slowly.
He/She was attentive to the questions and used good volume and clarity.
Fair

Main character paid some attention to the interviewer but, speech was sometimes too quiet or hard to understand, and/or he/she was impolite some of the time.
Poor

Main character rushed through the interview. He/She did not pay attention to the interviewer and/or was not polite. Difficult to hear or understand.
Punctuality

Very Good

Presentation was ready before the due date.
Good

Presentation was ready on time.
Fair

Presentation was 1 day late.
Poor

Presentation was 2 or more days late.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98