Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Process Approach Paragraph 2nd Grade rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Process Approach Paragraph 2nd Grade
Process Approach Paragraph 2nd Grade
A rubric that assesses students' application of the process approach to writing in an expository paragraph.
Rubric Code:
VC33WC
By
nicholebarnard
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
K-5
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
The Writing Process
Super Star
30 pts
On target
25 pts
So-So
20 pts
Missed The Buss
15 pts
Prewriting/Writing
Super Star
*Detailed evidence showing time spent brainstorming, organizing (use of graphic organizers) and <BR>
<BR>
*writing out ideas for this piece of writing.
On target
*Evidence shows the use of brainstorming, organizing (use of graphic organizers) and <BR>
<BR>
*writing out ideas for this piece of writing
So-So
*Some evidence that shows time spent brainstorming, orgainizing, and <BR>
<BR>
*writing out ideas for this piece of writing
Missed The Buss
* Little to no time spent brainstorming, organizing and <BR>
<BR>
*writing out ideas for this piece of writing
Drafting
Super Star
*Draft clearly includes ideas that were brainstormed and organized during prewriting
On target
*Draft includes ideas from prewriting session.
So-So
*Draft includes limited ideas from prewriting session. <BR>
<BR>
*An attempt was made to include the information from prewriting in draft.
Missed The Buss
*Draft includes little to no ideas from the prewriting session. <BR>
<BR>
*Little to no <BR>
information from prewriting is evident in draft
Revising
Super Star
*Student made numerous changes to writing, changing/adding details and description to make writing more attractive to reader.
On target
*Student revision shows adequate changes made to content and ideas in writing. <BR>
<BR>
*Details were added to enhance writing.
So-So
*Student attempted to make changes to their writing, however the changes were few and focused on editing verses content and description presented in writing.
Missed The Buss
*Student spent little to no time revising. <BR>
<BR>
*Little to no changes were made to paragraph based upon the class directions.
Editing
Super Star
*Few errors were made in spelling, capitalization, and punctuation. <BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
*All errors corrected.
On target
*Few errors were made in spelling, capitalization, and punctuation.<BR>
*Student spent ample time working on identifying and correcting editing errors.
So-So
*Frequent errors made in spelling, capitalization, paragraphing, and punctuation.<BR>
<BR>
*Student attempted to correct errors.
Missed The Buss
*Numerous errors in spelling, capitalization, and punctuation found in writing. <BR>
*Student did not attempt to correct errors.
Peer Revisions
Super Star
Received reviews from more than one student. Used suggestions from at least one review to improve revision paragraph.
On target
Received reviews from one student. Used comment from one review to improve revision of paragraph.
So-So
Received reviews from one or more students, but did not use comments to improve paragraph.
Missed The Buss
Did not get peer reviews.
Publishing
Super Star
*Final copy was neat and easy to read. Illustration aligns with paragraph.<BR>
<BR>
*All parts of writing - prewriting, first draft, second draft, and any other notes needed were turned in with draft.
On target
*Final copy was easy to read. Illustration aligns with paragraph. <BR>
<BR>
*Some parts of writing were missing.
So-So
*Final copy was somewhat legible. <BR>
<BR>
Parts of writing such as first draft, prewriting, etc., missing. Illustration missing or doesn't align.
Missed The Buss
Final copy not turned in on time. AND/OR
Too messy to read.
Missing illustration, draft, and revision.
Participation
Super Star
*Student used classtime wisely, meeting with a peer to revise. <BR>
<BR>
*Conversations during class were focused on revising/editing work.
On target
*Student mostly used classtime wisely, meeting with a peer to revise and edit. <BR>
*The majority of the time the student was focused and only one or two times did the student get off-task.
So-So
*Student sometimes used classtime wisely, however, student had to be refocused and reminded to work on writing, conversations/actions focused on other topics.
Missed The Buss
*Student frequently had to be refocused/reminded to work on writing, revising, and editing during class. <BR>
<BR>
*Student did not use classtime wisely.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.