Skip to main content
iRubric: Community Food Options Research & Mini Presentation rubric

iRubric: Community Food Options Research & Mini Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Community Food Options Research & Mini Presentation 
Mini Research Project and Presentation
Critical Theory of Educational Systems: Group Mini Research Project
Rubric Code: V24X37X
By tannerteaches
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Community Food Options Research & Presentation
  Needs Improvement

1 pts

Good

2 pts

Excellent

3 pts

Research

Quality (e.g. use of varied sources, evaluated and validated sources, accurate information)
Needs Improvement

Information is unreliable and/or inaccurate; resources are not valid
Good

Information is mostly accurate with only a few minor errors; one resource may be questionable; resources good but not varied enough
Excellent

Information is accurate; resources are legitimate; resources are varied when appropriate
Content of Presentation

Substantive use of information (e.g. explanations on political, economic, social, historical and geographical dimensions are complete and helpful; made connections, inferences, drew conclusions, noted convergence and divergence among resources)
Needs Improvement

Incomplete and/or not helpful explanations with little or no indication of interaction among dimensions; presents others’ information without analysis (e.g. drawing conclusions, making comparisons, connections and inferences)
Good

Explanations are complete and helpful but include little or no interaction among dimensions or explanations aren’t quite as complete or helpful but there is an indication of interaction among dimensions; draw some conclusions and make some inferences but miss obvious ones
Excellent

Explanations of dimensions are complete and helpful and indicate how the dimensions interact with each other; draw conclusions, make connections and inferences
Communication

Clarity (e.g. explains ideas well, integrates with slides, clear introduction and conclusion, obvious transitions, doesn’t use jargon, demonstrates knowledge of key points, responds well to questions)
Needs Improvement

Presentation is coherent, with clear introduction, transitions, language use, and conclusion; speaker demonstrates intimate knowledge of the subject
Good

Presentation is coherent for the most part, but missing 1 or 2 important elements
Excellent

Presentation lacks coherence
Self-Evaluation

Analysis of group process and individual role within it
Needs Improvement

Clearly articulates what worked well and why, what did not work well and why, and ways to increase effectiveness and efficiency of group process in the future, considering self as well as others
Good

Discusses only two of the three; discusses group without discussing self; discusses self without discussing group
Excellent

Does not articulate any of the three – what worked well and why, what didn’t work well and why, how to improve
Total Points

Needs Improvement
Good
Excellent




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98