Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Poster Presentations - Spring 2015 rubric

iRubric: Poster Presentations - Spring 2015 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Poster Presentations - Spring 2015 Oral Presentations - Spring 2015 This is the rubric for grading poster presentations in the Integrated Projects Curriculum of Messiah College Engineering Department. (v1.1, created 05/14 by TV) Rubric Code: UXWW76X By mcengin Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Engineering Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Poster Presentations This is the rubric for grading poster presentations in the Integrated Projects Curriculum of Messiah College Engineering Department.
	Exemplary/Excellent 5 pts	Accomplished/Good 4 pts	Developing/Fair 3 pts	Deficient/Poor 2 pts
Poster Content
Title 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Title summarizes the content of the poster well and encouraged the audience to read more.	Accomplished/Good Title summarizes the content of the poster well, but was not particularly compelling.	Developing/Fair Title only summarizes part of the poster.	Deficient/Poor Title is only tangentiallly related to the rest of the poster.
Communicates Mission and Activities 4 pts Why is this work being done?	Exemplary/Excellent Clearly and accurately describes the mission, project, and activities of the team in a way that can be understood by a wide audience.	Accomplished/Good Clearly and accurately describes the mission, project, and activities of the team in a way that can be understood by most audiences.	Developing/Fair Adequately describes the mission, project, and activities of the team in a way that can be understood by a limited audience or inaccurately describes parts of the mission, project, and activities of the team	Deficient/Poor Marginally describes the mission, project, and activities or inaccurately describes the mission, project, and activities of the team.
Methods / Techniques 4 pts How was this work done?	Exemplary/Excellent Clearly and accurately describes the actual work that was done in a way that can be understood by a wide audience.	Accomplished/Good Clearly and accurately describes the actual work that was done that can be understood by most audiences.	Developing/Fair Adequately describes the actual work that was done in a way that can be understood by a limited audience or inaccurately describes parts of the actual work that was done.	Deficient/Poor Marginally describes the actual work that was done or inaccurately describes the actual work that was done.
Results / Conclusions 4 pts What was the result of this work?	Exemplary/Excellent Clearly and accurately describes the results and conclusions that were achieved in a way that can be understood by a wide audience.	Accomplished/Good Clearly and accurately describes the results and conclusions that were achieved in a way that can be understood by most audiences.	Developing/Fair Adequately describes the results and conclusions that were achieved in a way that can be understood by a limited audience or inaccurately describes parts of the results and conclusions that were achieved.	Deficient/Poor Marginally describes the results and conclusions that were achieved or inaccurately describes the results and conclusions that were achieved.
Other content 3 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Other content (Acknowledgement, Additional Information, etc.) was complete and accurate.	Accomplished/Good Other content (Acknowledgement, Additional Information, etc.) was accurate, but was not complete.	Developing/Fair Other content (Acknowledgement, Additional Information, etc.) was inaccurate, but was complete.	Deficient/Poor Other content (Acknowledgement, Additional Information, etc.) was inaccurate, and was incomplete.
Mechanics
Visually Appealing 2 pts - good formatting of title block to attract attention - good font size and color - good arrangement of text and pictures, including appropriate whitespace - good use of borders and other structural elements	Exemplary/Excellent The poster has excellent visual appeal in all of the four areas specified in the description and shows creativity.	Accomplished/Good The poster has good visual appeal in all of the four areas specified in the description.	Developing/Fair The poster is inadequate in one of the four areas.	Deficient/Poor The poster is inadequate in two or more of the four areas.
Organized 3 pts	Exemplary/Excellent The poster is clearly organized in a way that matches the content and shows the audience how to read the poster.	Accomplished/Good The poster is organized in a way that shows the reader how to read the poster, but does not matches the content.	Developing/Fair The poster is organized in a way that matches the content, but does leave some confusion about how to read the poster.	Deficient/Poor The poster is organized and is a random set of information.
Balance of Text / Graphics 2 pts	Exemplary/Excellent An appropriate amount of text is used on the poster and graphics (pictures, figures, etc.) are used very effectively to aid the understanding of the text.	Accomplished/Good An appropriate amount of text is used on the poster but the graphics (pictures, figures, etc.) do not always aid the understanding of the text.	Developing/Fair Too much text or too little text although the graphics (pictures, figures, etc.) that are there do aid the understanding of that text.	Deficient/Poor Too much text or too little text and the graphics (pictures, figures, etc.) that are there have nothing to do with the text.
Language 2 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Language used is appropriate. Poster is very professional in appearance and free from grammatical errors.	Accomplished/Good Language used is appropriate. Poster is professional in appearance and contains no more than two grammatical errors.	Developing/Fair Language used is mostly appropriate. Poster is somewhat professional in appearance and contains three or four grammatical errors.	Deficient/Poor Language used is not appropriate. Poster is not professional in appearance and contains more than four grammatical errors.
Graphs 1 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Graphs are properly labeled (including axes and sets of data) and are formatted to clearly convey the point of the graph.	Accomplished/Good Graphs are properly labeled (including axes and sets of data) , but are not formatted in a way that clearly conveys the point of the graph.	Developing/Fair Graphs are properly labeled (including axes and sets of data) , but are not formatted in a way that obscures the point of the graph.	Deficient/Poor Graphs are not properly labeled (including axes and sets of data) .
Figures, Photographs 1 pts - Proper cropping of photographs - Clarity of photographs, figures - Appropriate labeling of figures, photographs - Usefullness of figures, photographs in conveying information presented in the poster	Exemplary/Excellent Figures and photographs are excellent in all four areas specified in the description.	Accomplished/Good Figures and photographs are good in all four areas specified in the description.	Developing/Fair Figures and photographs are inadequate in one of the four areas specified in the description.	Deficient/Poor Figures and photographs are inadequate in two or more of the four areas specified in the description.
Presentation
Interaction with Audience 2 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Presenter seemed very comfortable and engaged in talking to the audience about the project.	Accomplished/Good Presenter seemed comfortable in talking to the audience about the project.	Developing/Fair Presenter seemed uncomfortable in talking to the audience about the project.	Deficient/Poor Presenter refused to talk to the audience about the project.
Answering Questions 4 pts	Exemplary/Excellent Presenter seemed very ready to answer any questions about the project and had clearly thought about the implications of the work.	Accomplished/Good Presenter seemed ready to answer any questions about the project, but had not clearly thought about the implications of the work.	Developing/Fair Presenter seemed to have difficulty answering any questions about the project, and had not thought about the implications of the work.	Deficient/Poor Presenter could not answer any questions about the project, and had not thought about the implications of the work.

Keywords:

IPC, Poster Presentations

Subjects:

Engineering

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Engineering rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98