Skip to main content
iRubric: Seminar Cycle rubric

iRubric: Seminar Cycle rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Seminar Cycle 
Seminar Writing Only
Includes pre-writing, seminar, and post-writing activities
Rubric Code: UXW8756
By miriamarnold
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Powered by iRubric Seminar Cycle
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4.3 pts

Developing

3.8 pts

Needs Improvement

3 pts

Poor

1 pts

Prep Work
30 % Reading and Writing
Pre-Content Writing
5 pts

Excellent

Writing assignment is complete and includes well developed, thoughtful evidence for inspectional reading, vocabulary, and analytical reading assignments.
Good

Writing assignment is complete and includes evidence for inspectional reading, vocabulary, and analytical reading assignments.
Developing

Writing assignment is minimally incomplete and/or lacking effort and thought.
Needs Improvement

Writing assignment is incomplete.
Poor

Missing
Post Seminar Content Reflection
5 pts

Excellent

Student thoroughly answers the following question and cites specific examples from the text or from the discussion.
"What did you read, hear, or say that contributed to your understanding of the ideas of this seminar?"
Good

Student answers the following question and cites vague examples from the text or from the discussion.
"What did you read, hear, or say that contributed to your understanding of the ideas of this seminar?"
Developing

Student answers the following question, but does not include examples from the text or discussion.
"What did you read, hear, or say that contributed to your understanding of the ideas of this seminar?"
Needs Improvement

Student partially answers the following question.
"What did you read, hear, or say that contributed to your understanding of the ideas of this seminar?"
Poor

Missing
Seminar Participation
30 % Speaking and Listening
Process Goals and Reflection
5 pts

Excellent

Appropriate, challenging personal goal(s) have been chosen. The student accurately reflects on participation in the speaking and listening checklist and makes suggestions for improvement next seminar. The student is actively working on becoming a better participant.
Good

Appropriate personal goal(s) have been chosen. The student accurately reflects on participation in the speaking and listening checklist. The student is showing some effort to becoming a better participant.
Developing

Appropriate personal goal(s) have been chosen. The student completes the speaking and listening checklist with some accuracy. Effort to become a better seminar participant is unclear.
Needs Improvement

Personal goal(s) have been chosen, but do not reflect areas where the student demonstrates weakness. The student does not complete the speaking and listening checklist.
Poor

Missing
Seminar Map
5 pts

Teacher's Notes
Excellent

Student contributed valuable ideas and connections, and text references or extending questions to the overall discussion.
Good

Student contributed ideas or clarifying questions, connections, text references to the overall discussion.
Developing

Student was engaged in the discussion as an active listener.
Needs Improvement

Student only participated in the opening question and / or was disengaged during part of the discussion.
Poor

Student did not participate. Student not prepared and had to sit out of circle or asked to leave because of behavior.
Post Content
40 % Writings, artwork, and presentations
Mechanics and Conventions
3 pts

Excellent

Post-Writing assignment is complete and effectively demonstrates the student’s growth and thorough understanding of language conventions and mechanics
Good

Post-Writing assignment is complete and effectively demonstrates a proficient level of understanding of language conventions and mechanics
Developing

Post-Writing assignment is complete and demonstrates an average level of understanding of language conventions and mechanics
Needs Improvement

Post-Writing assignment is incomplete
Poor

missing
Ideas
3 pts

Excellent

Post-Writing assignment is complete and effectively demonstrates the student’s growth and thorough understanding of the big ideas—making connections to the seminar and real-life applications. Student followed guidelines for post.
Good

Post-Writing assignment is complete and effectively demonstrates a proficient level of understanding of the big ideas—making connections to the seminar. Student followed guidelines for post.
Developing

Post-Writing assignment is complete and demonstrates an average level of understanding of the big ideas. Student did not follow all guidelines for writing post.
Needs Improvement

Post-Writing assignment is incomplete
Poor

missing




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16