- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Theory Paper Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Theory Paper Rubric Philosophy Paper/Plan Rubric Rubric Code: UXA956 By kelvin_thompson Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: (General) Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Theory Paper Rubric
	Poor 389.4 pts	Fair 455.4 pts	Good 521.4 pts	Excellent 587.4 pts	Superior 660 pts
Completeness of assignment 22.5 %	Poor More than half of the components not incorporated	Fair Up to half of the components not incorporated	Good Two or more assignment components not incorporated	Excellent 1 assignment component not incorporated	Superior All assignment components incorporated into submission
Thoroughness 22.5 %	Poor Each topic is treated only weakly in the submission	Fair Some topics are treated somewhat weakly in the submission	Good Only some topics are treated somewhat thoroughly in the submission	Excellent Each topic is treated somewhat thoroughly in the submission	Superior Each topic is treated very thoroughly in the submission
Evidence of research 22.5 %	Poor Fewer than five references listed regardless of quality or integration	Fair Five inappropriate (non-scholarly) references listed regardless of integration	Good Five scholarly references listed but not integrated	Excellent Five scholarly references integrated into submission	Superior Five scholarly references well integrated into submission
Accuracy and/or quality of ideas 22.5 %	Poor Submission contains only unoriginal ideas and/or inaccurate information	Fair Submission contains few original ideas or some accurate information	Good Submission contains at least some original ideas and/or some accurate information	Excellent Entire content of submission contains original ideas and/or accurate information	Superior Entire content of submission contains well-developed original ideas and/or precisely-worded, accurate information
Surface features 10 % (e.g., formatting, correct spelling, grammar, complete sentences, and appropriate citations if necessary.)	Poor Lacks acceptable control of surface features (i.e., numerous distracting flaws in formatting, spelling, grammar, etc.)	Fair Very lax in control of surface features (i.e., formatting, spelling, grammar, typographical errors, etc.)	Good Somewhat lax in control of surface features (i.e., formatting, spelling, grammar, typographical errors, etc.)	Excellent Controls somewhat well for surface features (i.e., formatting, spelling, grammar, typographical errors, etc.)	Superior Controls very well for surface features (i.e., formatting, spelling, grammar, typographical errors, etc.)