- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Founding Father of Forensics rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Founding Father of Forensics Criminal Justice Career Path Project Students will choose an important contributor to the field of forensics. They will "become" this contributor and give a presentation of their accomplishments. They need to include a visual component as well as a hands on experiment for their "students" Rubric Code: UX9W997 By bchristensen Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Vocational Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Essential Questions
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Average 3 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Duties, Functions, and Salaries Student will "become" a Founding Father of forensics. They will pitch their contributions and do a hands on experiment of one of their inventions.	Poor Details about the FF are missing or too limited in scope.1 detail - stated well developed or not well developed. Many errors	Fair There is not sufficient information or detail about the FF. Multiple errors.	Average Sufficent information of FF in basic terms with few errors. details - fiarly well developed.	Good Good information. well planned. one/two errors	Excellent Very well developed presentation. Great preparation
Spelling & Grammar Used APA formatting with in-text citations, reference page, running head, paragraph headings, coherent sentences; Evident student used provided resources (www.purdueowl.com or APA manual).	Poor 4 or more errors Punctuation, Spelling, Grammar, Capitalization. Sentences do not make sense.	Fair 3 errors - Punctuation, Spelling Grammar, Capitaliztion.Some sentences make sense.	Average 2 errors - Punctuation, Spelling, Grammar, Capitalization. Some sentences make sense and are connected. .	Good 1 error - <BR> Punctuation, Spelling, Grammar, Capitalization; Sentences are clearly connected to topic.	Excellent 0 errors - Punctuation, Spelling, Grammar, Capitalization.Easy to read. Sentences make sense and are clearly connected to topic. .
Comprehension of Essential Question	Poor Project DOES NOT reflect understanding of FF project	Fair Project reflects MINIMAL understanding of FF Project	Average Project reflects BASIC understanding of FF Project	Good Project reflects GOOD understanding of FF Project	Excellent Project reflects COMPLETE understanding of FF Path Project
Practical Hands on experiment	Poor No hands on	Fair Hands on. little to no effort	Average Hands on. some effort. not specific	Good Hands on Good effort and planning. Well executed.	Excellent Hands on Exemplary effort and execution