Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Math Statistics Research Project rubric

iRubric: Math Statistics Research Project rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Math Statistics Research Project Math 1110 Elementary Statistics Research Project This assignment is for a beginning level statistics class The project requires the student locate a survey or research project and evaluate the design of the study or research project, the data collection, the analysis of the data, the presentation of data and the conclusions drawn. This evaluation will be submitted as a written report. Rubric Code: UX7357W By BIONDI_PAOLA Draft Public Rubric Subject: Math Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Survey/Research Project Content
	Excellent 3 pts	Good 2 pts	Fair 1 pts	Poor 0 pts	Grade (N/A)
Introductions & Rationale	Excellent The goal and motivation for conducting the survey or research project is clearly and accurately stated and, contains all pertinent information such as research variables and research question	Good The goal and motivation for conducting the survey or research project is stated but ambiguous. Contains some, but not all, pertinent information such as research variables and research qestion	Fair The goal and/or motivation for the survey or reserach project along with pertinent information is unclear or inaccurate .	Poor The goal and/or motivation for the survey or research project along with pertinent information, such as research variables and research question is missing.	Grade
Target Population	Excellent The target population is clearly and accurately identified.	Good The target population is identified.	Fair The target population is identified but is unclear and/or inaccurate	Poor The target population is not identified.	Grade
Data Collection	Excellent The data collected and method of collecting data are clearly stated and accurate. Visual representations of the data are noted and, analysis of the appropriateness of the method of presentation is clear and supported.	Good The data collected and method of collecting data are stated but unclear and/or inaccurate. Visual representations of the data are noted but, the analysis of the appropriateness of the method of presentation is missing or lacks support	Fair The data collected and method of collecting data are stated but unclear and/or inaccurate. Visual representations of the data are not noted and analysis is missing.	Poor The data collected and method of collecting data are missing from the report. Analysis is missing.	Grade
Results &Conclusion	Excellent The results are clearly stated, briefly explained and analyzed, and accurate	Good	Fair The results are not clearly stated, briefly explained and analyzed and/or inaccurate.	Poor The conclusion of those conducting the study is missing from the report	Grade
Discussion & Reflection	Excellent Evaluation of the methods, organization, statistics and presentation of data are clear and supported by criteria outlined in textbook and in class. Concerns and/or questions are clearly stated and supported	Good Evaluations of the methods, organization, statisics and presentation of data are included but are not specific and poorly supported by criteria outlined in textbook and in class. Concerns and/or questions are not specific and/or not supported.	Fair Evaluations of the methods, organization, statistics and presentation of data are included but views are not supported. No reference is made to concerns or questions	Poor Evaluation of the methods, organization, statistics and presentaion of data, along with concerns or questions are missing from the report.	Grade
Report
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	Grade (N/A)
Final Written Report	Excellent Written report is logical and organized. Sentences are well-phrased and varied in length and structure. Word choice is consistently precise and accurate. The writing is free or almost free of errors in grammar, spelling and writing mechanics (three or less). The report is the specified length of the assignement	Good Written report is generally logical and organized. Sentences are well-phrased and vary in length and structure. Word choice is generally good and mostly precise and accurate.There are occassional errors in grammar, spelling and writing mechanics. The report is the specified length of the assignment.	Fair Written report lacks logical progression or organization. Sentences are awkward and often unclear. Word choice is acceptable but range of words is limited or lack precision. The writing has many errors which impact the understanding of the report and cause a distraction. The report is shorter than the spedified length of the assignment.	Poor Written report is not logical or organized. Sentences do not form a cohesive whole and structure of sentences is distracting and confusing to the reader. Words are used inappropriately. There are many errors in grammar, spelling and writing mechanics. The report if shorter than the spedified length of the assignment.	Grade
Citations
	Excellent 3 pts	Good 2 pts	Fair 1 pts	Poor 0 pts	Grade (N/A)
Citations	Excellent MLA or other approved format is used accurately and consistently.	Good MLA or other approved format is used with some errors.	Fair The work is cited but does not follow any approved format	Poor Citation is missing.	Grade
Collaborative Work Skills
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 2 pts	Fair 1 pts	Poor 0 pts	Grade (N/A)
Quality of Work	Excellent Provides work of the highest quality possible and leads others to achieve the same quality.	Good Provides high quality work.	Fair Provides the required work and contributes when and what is asked.	Poor Did not contribute to the work required or did work that usually needs to be checked/ redone by others to ensure quality.	Grade
Problem Solving Skills	Excellent Actively looks for and suggests solutions to problems. Comes up with creative ways to solve problems.	Good Refines solutions suggested by others, uses others' ideas to formulate new ones.	Fair Does not suggest or refine solutions, but is willing to try out solutions suggested by others.	Poor Did not try to help solve problems encountered by group. Lets others do the work.	Grade
Working with Others	Excellent Almost always listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others. Tries to keep people working well together. Leads by demonstrating appropriate example.	Good Usually listens to, share with, and supports the efforts of others. Does not cause group to become unfocused on task.	Fair Did not try to help solve problems encountered by group. Lets others do the work.	Poor Did not make any contributions to ideas and made no effort to be part of the group.	Grade
Focus on the task	Excellent Consistently stays focused on the task and what needs to be done. Self-directed learner. Leads the group effectively.	Good Focuses on the task and what needs to be done most of the time. Other group members can count on this person for appropriate behavior.	Fair Focuses on the task and what needs to be done some of the time. Other group members sometimes remind the person to stay on task.	Poor Uses technology for self-serving purposes. Played games instead of working.	Grade

Keywords:

statistics, survey, inference, analysis,

Subjects:

Math

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Math rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16