Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Med-Surgical Clinical Concept Map Rubric

iRubric: Med-Surgical Clinical Concept Map Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Med-Surgical Clinical Concept Map Rubric Med-Surgical Clinical Concept Map Rubric Clinical concept map for 330 Conceptual Basis of Nursing Clinical. Student is to formulate a concept map for one client they have cared for in clinical week 4. Rubric Code: UX68B5C By sledwards Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Nursing Type: Assessment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Concept Maps
	Excellent 10 pts	Good 9 pts	Fair 8 pts	Poor 7 pts	Unsatisfactory 6 pts	Points awarded and comment section (N/A)
Chief Complaint/Pathophysiology Identify the pathophysiolgy of the primary medical diagnosis.	Excellent Medical Diagnoses clearly presented with explanation that demonstrates student understanding. Pathophysiology at cellular level shows understanding of medical diagnosis and comorbidities and identifies etiology based on the specific patient's condition.	Good Medical Diagnoses present with adequate explanation. Pathophysiology explained to organ level or doesn't take into account the comorbidities and does not give specific etiology for the patient's condition.	Fair Medical Diagnoses present with inadequate or unclear explanation. Pathophysiology and etiology presented but difficult to understand the connections to this patients condition.	Poor Medical Diagnoses present with minimal explanation. Pathophysiology information minimal with no correlation to patient condition.	Unsatisfactory No medical diagnosis or correlation to patient condition given. Pathophysiology absent.	Points awarded and comment section
Physical Assessment Objective and Subjective data from physical assessment and EPIC EMR medical chart. Information obtained from patient, family and other health care providers.	Excellent Physical assessment information complete with both objective and subjective data addressed at a thorough level, using both patient, family, chart and other health care providers.	Good Physical assessment information complete with objective and subjective assessment addressed at a basic level with utilizing patient, family and health care providers assistance.	Fair Physical assessment information incomplete, does not include both objective and subjective assessment data. Only obtained data from EMR and minimal amount from patient.	Poor Physical assessment information is incomplete, with minimal assessment data from objective or subjective data. Data only obtained from 1 source.	Unsatisfactory Physical sssessment information is absent or includes no significant data.	Points awarded and comment section
Labs or other related diagnostics Lab values and/or diagnostics presented with abnormal lab values including rationale and correlation to patient illness.	Excellent Lab and/or diagnostic results presented and abnormals addressed and related to the patient's specific condition(s) with appropriate linking to pathophysiology.	Good Lab and/or diagnostic results presented and abnormals addressed and related to the patient's condition.	Fair Lab and/or diagnostic results incomplete. Abnormal results addressed, but not complete. Minimal correlation included.	Poor Lab and/or diagnostic results given with no discussion of abnormals and no correlation included.	Unsatisfactory No lab values presented.	Points awarded and comment section
Medications Lists patient medications with reason for why medication prescribed for this patient.	Excellent Complete medication list included with rationale for medication to the student's specific patient and appropriate links to pathophysiolgy.	Good Complete medication list done, but lacks rationale for medications.	Fair Medication list done only for medications given but not prn and other regularly scheduled medications. Rationale minimal and only for medications listed.	Poor Medication list present but incomplete. Missing at least 25% of the medications Lacks rationale to the patient.	Unsatisfactory No medications or rationale listed.	Points awarded and comment section
Collaborative Practice Identifies one other healthcare discipline involved in the care of this patient.	Excellent Identifies one other healthcare discipline and fully indicates their role in the care of this patient.	Good Identifies one other healthcare discipline and briefly highlights their role in the care of this patient.	Fair Identifies one other healthcare discipline but does not comment on their role in the care of this patient.	Poor Identifies one other healthcare discipline that is not related to the care of this patient.	Unsatisfactory Does not identify another healthcare discipline.	Points awarded and comment section
Nursing Problems List at least 3 nursing problems/diagnoses, show prioritization of care based on patient's needs.	Excellent Four nursing problems/diagnoses given with prioritization based on the patient's condition/need(s).	Good Three nursing problems/diagnoses given with prioritization based on patient condition/need(s).	Fair At least three nursing problems/diagnoses are given with lack of prioritization or inappropriate prioritization based on patient needs.	Poor Less than three nursing problems/diagnoses given. Lacks any prioritization.	Unsatisfactory Only 1 or no nursing problems listed.	Points awarded and comment section
Goals Include two goals for each nursing diagnosis.	Excellent Goals present for all problems/diagnoses listed with measurable outcomes and timeframes.	Good Goals present for 3 problems/diagnoses with measurable outcomes and timeframes noted.	Fair Goals present for some of the problems/diagnoses but, are not measurable or no timeframe identified.	Poor Goals not present for each identified nursing diagnosis. Goals not measurable.	Unsatisfactory No goals present.	Points awarded and comment section
Interventions Determine 3 interventions for each goal. Include rationale and justification and outcome for each goal.	Excellent Outstanding relationships noted between problem/diagnosis, goal and interventions for each goal.	Good Acceptable number of interventions per goal with relationship noted between the problem, goal, and interventions given.	Fair Less than the acceptable number of interventions for each of the patient's problem(s) and goal(s) listed and each goal identified. Lacks rationale for the interventions.	Poor One specific intervention or less for each of the patient problem(s) and goal(s) listed for the patient's designed problem and goal identified. Limited or no connections.	Unsatisfactory No interventions included.	Points awarded and comment section
Evaluation Include reassessment data and any modifications to care needed.	Excellent Synthesizes connections between interventions and reassessment data. Demonstrates exceptional critical thinking for this patient assignment.	Good Has thorough reassessment data and demonstrates adequate critical thinking for this patient assignment.	Fair Has reassessment data but lacks demonstration of critical thinking skills for this patient assignment.	Poor Reassessment data poor with no critical thinking skills demonstrated.	Unsatisfactory No reassessment completed.	Points awarded and comment section
Creativity/Spelling/Grammar Concept map needs to be well organized, easy to read, logical, & neat. Proper spelling expected.	Excellent Eloquent execution with demonstration of advanced terms no grammatical or spelling errors. Map is well organized, logical, and neatly presented.	Good Inviting to look at with excellent organization. Correct spelling and no grammatical errors.	Fair Neat with minor spelling, and grammatical errors. Lacks organization and map is difficult to follow.	Poor Disorganized, several spelling or grammatical errors. Lacks logic and is very difficult to follow.	Unsatisfactory Not organized, spelling and grammar errors noted in every section. Lacks logic and map was unable to be followed.	Points awarded and comment section
Total column and comment section	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	Unsatisfactory	Points awarded and comment section

Keywords:

Nursing Concept Map

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Health rubrics

More Homework rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98