Skip to main content
iRubric: AC840XA Culminating Experience Grading Rubric - Spring 2016

iRubric: AC840XA Culminating Experience Grading Rubric - Spring 2016

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
AC840XA Culminating Experience Grading Rubric - Spring 2016 
AC840XA Culminating Experience Grading Rubric - Spring 2016
Rubric Code: UX63W5W
By jbrocato
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Accounting  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Culminating Experience Project 2016
  Meets Expectations

3 pts

Somewhat Meets Expectations

2 pts

Below Expectations

1 pts

Grading Points Awarded

0 pts

Introduction to the paper

Meets Expectations

Clearly identifies the purpose of the paper. Conveys significance of the paper. Adopts a reasonable tone. Includes a brief road map description of what the reader will see in subsequent parts of the paper.
Somewhat Meets Expectations

Somewhat identifies the purpose of the paper. Significance of the paper is not well stated. Tone for what is to be covered is not well developed. Includes a limited description of what is to follow in the paper.
Below Expectations

Limited or no statement of the purpose of the paper is presented. Basically leave it up to the reader to figure this out. Includes little or no road map description of what is to follow in the paper.
Grading Points Awarded
Part 1: Body of the paper

Meets Expectations

Identifies and clearly relates FOUR principles from Buffett's list business principles to examples in the 2016 Letter to Shareholders. Relationships between principles and examples are well developed.
Somewhat Meets Expectations

Somewhat identifies and relates FOUR principles from Buffett's list of business principles to examples in the 2016 Letter to Shareholders. Relationships between principles and examples are somewhat but not fully developed.
Below Expectations

Attempts to identify and relate principles from Buffett's list of business principles to examples in the 2016 Letter to Shareholders. Relationships between principles and examples are not well developed. Reasoning is confusing and hard to follow.
Grading Points Awarded
Part 2: Body of the paper

Meets Expectations

Identifies one key issue for each of the five highlighted sections from the 2016 Letter to Shareholders and relates it to specific topics covered during the course. Documents the source and links between the "2016 Letter" and topics covered in the textbook. States which "story" (Buffett or Horngren) best meets the test of being clear, concise, and understandable? Explains why team reached its conclusion.
Somewhat Meets Expectations

Identifies one key issue for each of the five highlighted sections from the 2016 Letter to Shareholders and somewhat relates it to specific topics covered during the course. Attempts to documents the source and links between the "2016 Letter" and topics covered in the textbook. States which "story" (Buffett or Horngren) best meets the test of being clear, concise, and understandable? Attempts to explains why team reached its conclusion.
Below Expectations

Attempts, but not necessarily succeeds in identifying one key issue for each of the five highlighted sections from the 2016 Letter to Shareholders to relate to specific topics covered during the course. Partially documents the source and links between the "2016 Letter" and topics covered in the textbook. Does not state which "story" (Buffett or Horngren) best meets the test of being clear, concise, and understandable? Does not explain why team reached its conclusion.
Grading Points Awarded
Closing Comments

Meets Expectations

Clearly answered each of the three questions posed in instructions for Closing Comments.
Somewhat Meets Expectations

Somewhat answered each of the three questions posed in instructions for Closing Comments.
Below Expectations

Answered part but not all of the three questions posed in instructions for Closing Comments.
Grading Points Awarded
Cites/References

Meets Expectations

Demonstrates consistent application of APA 6 conventions and procedures. Occasional errors found.
Somewhat Meets Expectations

Demonstrates some application of APA 6 conventions and procedures. Frequent errors found.
Below Expectations

Demonstrates limited application/knowledge of APA 6 conventions and procedures. Numerous errors found.
Grading Points Awarded
Writing Style

Meets Expectations

Skillfully selects and uses a range of writing strategies such as comparing and contrasting, using concrete details, descriptions, and links between Buffett's 2016 letter and course resources. Writing is clear, concise, and clearly enjoyable to read.
Somewhat Meets Expectations

Reasonably uses a range of writing strategies such as comparing and contrasting, using concrete details, descriptions, and relevant links between Buffett's 2016 letter and course resources. Writing is somewhat clear and concise, and somewhat enjoyable to read.
Below Expectations

Writing strategies are used ineffectively. Applies on a limited basis strategies such as comparing and contrasting, using concrete details, and descriptions and relevant links between Buffett's 2016 letter and course resources. Writing is difficult to read and follow (i.e., somewhat confusing). Not necessarily enjoyable to read.
Grading Points Awarded
Grammar

Meets Expectations

Demonstrates control of usage, grammar, punctuation, sentence construction, and spelling. Few if any errors found.
Somewhat Meets Expectations

Demonstrates some control of usage, grammar, punctuation, sentence construction, and spelling. Some errors found.
Below Expectations

Demonstrates little control of usage, grammar, punctuation, sentence construction, and spelling. Numerous errors found.
Grading Points Awarded
Project Instructions

Meets Expectations

Followed instructions.
Somewhat Meets Expectations

Somewhat followed instructions.
Below Expectations

Failed to follow instructions.
Grading Points Awarded



Keywords:
  • AC840XA

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98