- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Mock Trial Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Mock Trial Rubric SWBAT select examples, exhibit knowledge of case, and correctly utilize terminology to formulate, argue and justify their opinion of the case through written text and spoken interaction. Rubric Code: UX5XX7W By joshghenderson Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 6-8

Mock Trial Rubric
	Insufficient 1 pts	Proficient 2 pts	Outstanding 3 pts
Knowledge of Case	Insufficient Shows a lack of knowledge about the court case. - gets lost easily - gets confused - mixes up evidence - mixes up timeline	Proficient Shows a decent understanding of the court case. - understands timeline - knows the roles - stays on task/doesn't get confused	Outstanding Shows an exemplary understanding of the court case. - understands case and uses the details to their role's benefit - stays on task/doesn't get confused
Mastery of Role	Insufficient Does not do well with their role. - Gets lost in role - Is not prepared - Doesn't understand purpose - Doesn't help their team (defense, prosecution, etc.) - Does not have their role memorized and needs notes to be reminded	Proficient Does a decent job with their role. - Knows their role - Is decently prepared - Helps team but leaves something to be desired - Does an adequate job with knowledge of role - Has most of the role memorized and uses notes minimally	Outstanding Does an exemplary job with their role. - Knows most of the details of their role - Is prepared and uses their knowledge of their role to their own and their team's advantage - Has role memorized and uses details of their role without notes
Utilizes Examples	Insufficient - Did not use examples to build case. - Uses faulty logic - Uses wrong examples - Uses made-up examples	Proficient - Uses a few examples to build case - Uses logic based on case - Missed a few examples that would have helped case	Outstanding - Uses examples to build case - Uses logic to use examples to their advantage - Uses examples throughout and did not miss an opportunity to do so
Utilizes Terminology	Insufficient - Avoided using courtroom terms - Showed a lack of understanding of courtroom terms	Proficient - uses courtroom terms occasionally - Shows an understanding when others use courtroom terms	Outstanding - Used courtroom terms when necessary - Understood when others used courtroom terms