- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Supreme Court Case-Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Supreme Court Case-Presentation Supreme Court Case-Presentation Supreme Court Case. Rubric Code: UCC2B2 By mi8st8er Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: History Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Case Study Presentation
	Poor 10 pts	Fair 15 pts	Good 20 pts	Superior 25 pts
Overall Performance	Poor Student did not meet the expectations of this assignment. No information described in presentation about Supreme Court case; more than 3 inaccuracies	Fair Student met few of the expectations of this assignment. Very little information described in presentation about Supreme Court case; more than 2 inaccuracies	Good The student clearly understood the assignment and met the expectations. Information described in presentation about Supreme Court case was somewhat accurate; no more than 1 inaccuracy.	Superior The student clearly understood the assignment and exceeded the expectations. Information described in presentation about Supreme Court case was completely accurate.
Case Facts & Background	Poor Identifies & understands almost none of the basic information or lower court trials; no context for court case.	Fair Identifies & understands few of the basic case facts and lower court trials with little context	Good Identifies & understands most of the case facts and lower court trials; puts the court case in context but with some inaccuracies.	Superior Identifies & understands the case, the parties involved, the time frame, the lower court trials, and the reason it was heard at the Supreme Court.
Effects of Case	Poor Analysis was only provided of the effects of the case.	Fair Marginal analysis of of the effects of the case.	Good Reasonably thorough analysis of each the effects of the case.	Superior Very thorough and insightful analysis of each the effects of the case. Brings effects to personal level.
Decision	Poor The final decision was not included.	Fair The final decision was included but was incorrectly stated.	Good The final decision was shared accurately, including the tally of concurring and dissenting votes, but additional information was ommited.	Superior Explained the decision of the court, explaining the concurring and dissenting votes and the final decision was correct and put into context.