RCampus - Learning, ePortfolios, Assessments, Outcomes
Enter your login name here, or click here to go to the login page.
Enter your password:
forgot?   | click here to create a free account.
iRubric: Online Discussion Board - CRJ 395 Administation of Justice rubric

iRubric: Online Discussion Board - CRJ 395 Administation of Justice rubric

preview rubric

 

edit print email Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run apply to... delete

Online Discussion Board - CRJ 395 Administation of Justice built by Tami334

Rubric Code: UAA528
The discussion board and learning journal will make up your participation / activity grade. 100 points will be possible at midterm and again during finals week (50 points for discussion board and 50 points for learning journal).
ready Ready to use    public Public Rubric

Directly link to this rubric or embed it on your website:
url:
link:
embed:
Keywords: (None)
Categories: Subjects: Social Sciences  
Types: (Other)  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Discussion Board
  Below
1 pts Effort at this level is less than expected and is graded as "D" or "F"
Meets Expectations
2 pts Effort at this level represents what is expected and is therefore graded in the "C" range
Exceeds
3 pts Effort at this level is more than expected and is graded as "B" or "A"
Post construction
15 pts
Below

Simple posts that lack insight, depth, or are superficial. Entries tend to be short and frequently irrelevant to the key question. Does not express opinion clearly. Shows little understanding.
Meets Expectations

Posts are rather simple but show some insight, depth, or connection to the key question. Some material may be irrelevant, but personal opiniion is appropriately expressed & posts as a whole show understanding.
Exceeds

Posts show insight, depth, & understanding. They connect with the topic and include references to supporting material (e.g., URLs, files). Personal opinion is appropriately expressed & clearly related to the thread.
Reply construction
10 pts
Below

Simple replies that lack insight, depth, or are superficial. Entries tend to be short and frequently irrelevant to the original post. Does not express opinion clearly. Shows little understanding.
Meets Expectations

Replies are rather simple but show some insight, depth, or connection to the original post. Some material may be irrelevant, but personal opiniion is appropriately expressed & posts as a whole show understanding.
Exceeds

Replies show insight, depth, & understanding. They connect with the original post and add to that post by including references to supporting material (e.g., URLs, files). Personal opinion is appropriately expressed & clearly related to original post.
Evaluation: Critique & Questions
15 pts
Below

Little or no effort is made to provide constructive criticism of other posts or replies.

Little or no effort is made to pose appropriate questions or to respond to questions posed by others.
Meets Expectations

Provides, in an appropriate manner, rather simple critiques of other posts/replies that could be helpful to the original author.

Appropriate questions are posed or responded to in a manner that shows good understanding of the topic and an acceptable ability to defend one's position.
Exceeds

Provides, in an appropriate manner, constructive criticism of other posts/replies that should be of considerable help to the original author.

Poses/replies to especially focused or challenging questions in a way showing significant understanding of the topic and a good ability to defend one's position.
Community contribution
5 pts
Below

Little or no effort is made to participate in the development of the community.
Meets Expectations

Some attempts at directing discussion or presenting viewpoints that encourages group involvement.
Exceeds

Consistently provides leadership and creativity by engaging and motivating the learning community.
Grammar/Mechanics
5 pts
Below

Poor spelling and grammatical errors in several posts/replies. Written in informal language, abbreviations or txt.
Meets Expectations

Posts/replies have few spelling and grammatical errors. Text construction is mostly formal with few abbreviations or txt style language.
Exceeds

Posts/replies consistently show good grammar, have little or no spelling errors, and are presented in a structure/format that enhances readability.



Discuss this rubric



Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Bookmark this page:   RCampus RCampus   twit this twitter   delicious del.icio.us   digg Digg   facebook Facebook  
About Education Sites & Communities My Account Support
About RCampus
Terms of Use
Security & Privacy
Site Map
Case Studies
Classrooms
ePortfolios
Rubrics
Coursework
Grades
Book Exchange
Tutors
Website Gallery
Basic Groups
Study Groups
Club websites
Faculty Groups
My Account Settings
My Messages
My Calendar
My To-do List
My Favorites
My Documents
Free Sign up
Log in
Help & FAQ
Contact Us
Copyright © 2017 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.