Skip to main content
iRubric: Biology Presentation Rubric 2019

iRubric: Biology Presentation Rubric 2019

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Biology Presentation Rubric 2019 
This purpose of this presentation was to become familiar with presenting scientific data to an audience.
Rubric Code: U2W4854
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Biology  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Presentation
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

2 pts

Failed

1 pts

Slides

Excellent

The slides contained:
1) The title slide was distinct from the rest of the slide.
2) No sentences on the slides other than data. Unless needed for impact.
3) One chart/figure at a time per slide to minimize confusion
4) Slide was annotated in a clear, accurate, professional manner
5)"Open floor" slide present at the end
Good

The slides contained 4 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Fair

The slides contained 3 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Poor

The slides contained 2 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Failed

The slides contained 1 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Content

If 3) and/or 5) of the 5pt. column are not met then the maximum point for this section can not exceed 1pt.

Excellent

1) The project included all information relevant to the topic in an organized fashion.
2) Material was presented accurately and in an appropriately detailed fashion.
3) Compare and Contrast with model organism is made
4) References for information are posted
5) Image of organism is posted and defined
6) Cause of issue is well defined
Good

The slides contained 4 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Fair

The slides contained 3 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Poor

The slides contained 2 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Failed

The slides contained 1 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Organization

Excellent

The presentation contained all of the following properties:
1) The title slide was descriptive and contained the name of the presenter with the date.
2) Slide transition was smooth and timely.
3) The presentation flowed in a logical manner (Intro - Results - Conclusion)
4) A summary slide was presented
5) ALL of the team knew where they were in the PPt and added to the presentation at appropriate time
Good

The slides contained 4 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Fair

The slides contained 3 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Poor

The slides contained 2 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Failed

The slides contained 1 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Time management

Excellent

The presentation was within the 3-5-10 min allotted time frame. AND there was no obvious stalling for time.
Good

The presentation was under allotted time frame by 1 minute.
Fair

The presentation was under allotted time frame by 2 minute.
Poor

The presentation was under allotted time frame by 3 minute.
Failed

Was a waste of time where little or nothing was on target, or there was no presentation.
Presentation/interaction

Excellent

The presenter:
1) Spoke loudly and clearly.
2) Spoke with cadence (not monotone).
3) Faced the audience.
4) Engaged the audience (looked up and at people in the audience).
5) Was not distracting the audience (jingling keys in the pocket, etc.)
6) Was not reading from script cards, verbatim.
7) Did not read slides except to make impact statements
Good

The presenter followed 6 of the points outlined in the 5 pt column.
Fair

The presenter followed 5 of the points outlined in the 5 pt column.
Poor

The presenter followed 4 of the points outlined in the 5 pt column.
Failed

The presenter followed 3 of the points outlined in the 5 pt column.
Work quality/effort

Excellent

The work done was excellent. The appropriate amount of effort was put into completing the presentation and making understandable to the audience.
Good

The work was done with good effort. The appropriate amount of effort was put into completing the presentation.
Fair

Work was done with fair effort. It was evident that the work was rushed.
Poor

Work was done with little effort. It was evident that the work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete.
Failed

Failed to present or did not contribute to the finale product adequately.
requirements met

Excellent

1)Conditions for the species were caused by humans.
2) The compare and contrast is accurate and logical to the viewer without having to make "reaching" statements.
3) Cascade was explained in detail with few generalizations.
4) explanation of what is being done to correct the issue, or, if none are offered, a feasible proposal as to what you think should be done.
5) Justification for how well the solution will work based on some form of evidence.
Good

The slides contained 4 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Fair

The slides contained 3 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Poor

The slides contained 2 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Failed

The slides contained 1 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Attitude toward work

If you don't like doing the work... hide the attitude and present like you love it! It will help you sell it to the audience.

Excellent

1) Student seemed genuinely interested in the work and research subject.
2) Was able to answer questions from audience; including teacher.
Good

Student seemed genuinely interested in the work or research, but allowed an obvious disconnect with the audience; discontent/frustrated
Fair

Student seemed genuinely interested in the work or lab, but allowed audience to see discontent/frustrated and was unsure of their work or unprepared.
Poor

Student seemed disinterested in the work and lab
Failed

Lazy or Bad attitude



Keywords:
  • Microbiology presentation

Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98