Skip to main content
iRubric: Visual Analysis Rubric

iRubric: Visual Analysis Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Visual Analysis Rubric 
Visual Analysis Rubric
Students are asked to study and analyze a work of art on exhibit at MCAD with reference to course material as appropriate.
Rubric Code: U247BW7
By dotreeser
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Reflection  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Visual Analysis Rubric
  Absent

50 pts

Minimal

60 pts

Developing

75 pts

Competent

85 pts

Excellent

100 pts

Thesis

Absent

The paper lacks a thesis statement.
Minimal

Thesis is unclear or a non-issue.
Developing

Thesis is underdeveloped.
Competent

Thesis is clearly formulated, but lacks creativity and/or complexity.
Excellent

Thesis is creative and well developed.
Observations

Absent

Makes no specific or descriptive observations of the work.
Minimal

Makes few specific or descriptive observations of the work.
Developing

Makes some observations of the work, but they remain vague and generalizing; they do not tie to broader claims or ideas.
Competent

Observations of the work are often specific and descriptive, but they may not tie clearly to broader claims or ideas.
Excellent

Observations of the work are highly specific, descriptive, and clearly tied to broader claims that support the paper's main ideas.
Analysis

Absent

Does not analyze the work in light of visual observations.
Minimal

Analysis is limited; may resemble a "laundry list" of features unconnected with larger ideas or may get off-topic.
Developing

Analysis of the work is attempted but is not sufficiently supported by visual and critical observations.
Competent

Draws together visual and critical observations to support analysis, but may not do so consistently or persuasively.
Excellent

Draws together visual and critical observations to support a persuasive, clear analysis that ties in to theoretical statement relevant to the discussion.
Writing

Absent

Writing is inarticulate and entirely ineffective.
Minimal

Writing has serious technical flaws; it may lack specificity or logical structure; meaning remains unclear.
Developing

Writing has moderate grammatical or other flaws, is poorly edited, and/or uses vague language that leaves meaning unclear.
Competent

Writing is competent, mostly grammatically correct, and generally effective, but may lack rhetorical force.
Excellent

Writing is fluent, articulate, and specific; it advances the argument with persuasiveness and rhetorical verve. Contains no or extremely few grammatical errors.
Presentation and structure

Absent

Does not follow given instructions. No inclusion of image/artwork as subject of analysis and discussion. Does not cite references. Does not follow structure of presentation.
Minimal

Included image of the subject/artwork being analyzed and discussed. Does not cite any reference. Structure of presentation is incomplete.
Developing

Included image of the subject/artwork being analyzed and discussed but lacks sufficient amount of references to support claims and opinion. Lacks
Competent

Included image of the subject/artwork being discussed. Follows given structure of presentation. Draws discussion from the visual imagery supplemented by related amount of theories with cited references.
Excellent

Included image of the subject/artwork being analyzed. Contains clear outline of presentation following given structure. Draws discussion of each point according to subject matter supported by amount of related references.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16