Skip to main content
iRubric: Project Record Analysis - Fall 2015 rubric

iRubric: Project Record Analysis - Fall 2015 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Project Record Analysis - Fall 2015 
Portfolio Analysis Section - Spring 2012
This is the rubric for grading Analysis Project Records in the Integrated Projects Curriculum of Messiah College Engineering Department. (v1.0, created 10/11 by TV, v2.0, revised 03/12 by TW, v2.1, revised 12/14 by TJV)
Rubric Code: TXXB496
By mcengin
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Mechanics
20 %
  Exemplary/Excellent

5 pts

Accomplished/Good

4 pts

Developing/Fair

3 pts

Deficient/Poor

2 pts

Non Applicable

(N/A)

Setting / Context
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

References the project assignment and its relationship to the project goals, as well as the date of completion, timeliness of sub-mission, and co-workers
Accomplished/Good

References the project assignment, date of completion, and co-workers involved
Developing/Fair

References only the project assignment that lead to the portfolio entry.
Deficient/Poor

Does not describe the relationship of the portfolio entry with the overall project
Non Applicable

N/A
Appearance
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Exceptionally well formatted word-processed document.
Accomplished/Good

Properly formatted word-processed document.
Developing/Fair

Neatly handwritten or unformatted type.
Deficient/Poor

Illegible or sloppy.
Non Applicable

N/A
Writing Mechanics
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Writing is free of grammatical and spelling errors
Accomplished/Good

Writing is mostly free of grammatical and spelling errors.
Developing/Fair

Grammatical and spelling errors are present but do not detract from the reflection.
Deficient/Poor

Grammatical and spelling errors detract from the reflection. The FYS professor picks up the red pen to correct them…
Non Applicable

N/A
Content
80 %
  Exemplary/Excellent

5 pts

Accomplished/Good

4 pts

Developing/Fair

3 pts

Deficient/Poor

2 pts

Non Applicable

(N/A)

Choice of Method
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Uses method appropriate for teh system, considering accuracy, time, and other project constraints.
Accomplished/Good

Chooses appropriate methods, but has not fully considered project constraints.
Developing/Fair

Recognizes project constraints, but chooses a method inconsistent with those constraints.
Deficient/Poor

Chooses a method without considering project constraints.
Non Applicable

N/A
Input Specifications
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

The inputs (boundary conditions, outputs from other systesm) are correct and have been carefully considered.
Accomplished/Good

Inputs (boundary conditions, outputs from other systems) are probably correct, but have not been carefully thought out.
Developing/Fair

Inputs (boundary conditions, outputs from other systems) have questionable accuracy.
Deficient/Poor

The inputs (boundary conditions, outputs from other systems) are wrong.
Non Applicable

N/A
Assumptions
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Assumptions are reasonable and the implications of the assumptions on the analysis have been considered.
Accomplished/Good

Assumptions are probably reasonsable, but have not been fully thought out.
Developing/Fair

Assumptions are questionable.
Deficient/Poor

Assumptions that lead to large errors in the analysis have been made.
Non Applicable

N/A
Correctness
2 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

The analysis is done accurately and carefully with checks set up on the analysis.
Accomplished/Good

The analysis is done accurately and carefully.
Developing/Fair

The analysis is only approximately accurate.
Deficient/Poor

The analysis is wrong.
Non Applicable

N/A
Error Bounds
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

The significance of possible errors in the model (including numeric errors) have been considered, controlled for, and quantified.
Accomplished/Good

Possible errors in the model have been considered and controlled for, but not quantified.
Developing/Fair

Only a few possible sources of error have been thought about.
Deficient/Poor

Errors were not considered at all.
Non Applicable

N/A
Interpretation of Results
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Uses results to predict system behaviour and direct project design efforts.
Accomplished/Good

Uses results to guide project design process, but does not grasp the generalization.
Developing/Fair

Reports results, but does not grasp their significance.
Deficient/Poor

"Failed" results are not reported as failures.
Non Applicable

N/A




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98