Skip to main content
iRubric: INFOshare - Trend Topics to Peers in Event Mgmt rubric

iRubric: INFOshare - Trend Topics to Peers in Event Mgmt rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
INFOshare - Trend Topics to Peers in Event Mgmt 
Informative Group Presentation
Group given topics to research for informative presentation. Group has to prepare a presentation that has to be presented in front of the class. Presentation could be presented with supplemental visuals. Student teams determine level of formality (may be formal or informal)
Rubric Code: TXX8W99
By cwittke
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Informative Presentation:
  Poor - Does not meet

0 or 1 pts

(N/A)

Fair - Somewhat meets

2 pts

(N/A)

Good - Meets

3 or 4 pts

(N/A)

Excellent - Beyond requirements

5 pts

(N/A)

Quality of Project
10 pts

Project was extremely organized, interesting, and easy to follow. Project fully informed audience about the topic.<BR>
Students were given one of the following: activity, diagram, or handout.
Poor - Does not meet

Project was not organized. Information presented was not clear. Project did not fully answer all the questions asked on the outline.
There were no activities, diagrams, or handouts for the class.
Fair - Somewhat meets

Project was fairly organized. Information presented was clear. Project did not fully answer all the questions asked on the outline.
There were no activities, diagrams, or handouts for the class.
Good - Meets

Project was extremely organized.
Information presented was clear and interesting.
Project may not fully answer all the questions asked on the outline.
Students were given one of the following: activity, diagram, or handout.
Excellent - Beyond requirements

Project was extremely organized, interesting, and easy to follow.
Project fully informed audience about the topic and showed advanced critical thinking and application of knowledge from within the program.
Students were given one of the following: activity, diagram, or handout.
Overall this stands out from the crowd
Quality of Presentation
10 pts

Content and Delivery Style
Covering what was required by the outline
Poor - Does not meet

Presentation was not clearly audible and hard to hear. Visual presentation was very disorganized and hard to read. Group members did not ask for questions and were unable to answer questions asked by other students or the instructor.
Students do not seem prepared to present.
Little or no eye contact. Body language and posture poor.
Format for presentation and/or written report are cohesive. Grammatical, language and format errors.
Team outward appearance sloppy/unkempt.
Fair - Somewhat meets

Presentation was audible, but needs improvement on tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project could be better organized and easier to read. Group members were
Students seem to be pretty prepared but should have rehearsed more as a team.
Students make some eye contact, but entire room is not fully engaged, with most attention to the instructor.
Quality meet minimum standards.
Students are neatly groomed.
Good - Meets

Presentation was audible. Good tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project was organized and easy to read.Group members were
able to answer most questions posed by instructor and other students.
Visually works.
Excellent - Beyond requirements

Professional quality work - audio and visual aspects were error free.
Students show that they are completely prepared and that they have rehearsed before the presentation.
Students stand up straight, look confident, speak clearly and make eye contact during the entire presentation. Students engages entire audience through-out presentation.
Cohesiveness between presentation materials and written report demonstrate advanced application of learning.
Cohesiveness - Group Style and Deli
10 pts

All group members participate equally. Group members help each other as needed.
Delivery is balanced and rehearsed
Poor - Does not meet

Only one person in the group participate in the presentation.
Fair - Somewhat meets

Some group members participate.
Good - Meets

Majority of the group participates but it doesn't flow well or their might be some repetition/overlap appears as not rehearsed
uniform look and feel to team, language, visuals
but lacks formality (language, dress etc)
Excellent - Beyond requirements

All group members participate and help each other as needed.
Speaker content flows logically between all parties.Students are well groomed, in business attire or a team uniform.
Question for Exam
5 pts

each team must submit a question for the exam
did they share it with their peers and explain the answers
Poor - Does not meet

did not do
question format is below average and shows very little thought and attention to details
Fair - Somewhat meets

question and answer could work with some re-development/re-writing
materials to peers are provided late
Good - Meets

complexity appropriate for this level of course
question is well phrased
answers are provided
information is shared with the group in writing so they have study materials
Excellent - Beyond requirements

interactive question format when presented to allow for greater information retention
all items as listed for "meets"
professionalism/effort
Time Limit
5 pts

Within time limit
Good use of time available
Keep audience engaged
Poor - Does not meet

Too short
Under 8 minutes
# of minutes
______________
Fair - Somewhat meets

Too long
(over 13 minutes)
# of minutes
_______________
Good - Meets

Within Time Frame (9 to 11 minutes)
felt like some parts not wrapped up
feels like "oh my gosh we just got the 1 minute warning we better finish up)
Excellent - Beyond requirements

Within Time Frame (9 to 11 minutes)
Intro
body
conclusion - wrap up is rehearsed/intentional
Total
40 pts

Comments on back
Poor - Does not meet
Fair - Somewhat meets
Good - Meets
Excellent - Beyond requirements



Keywords:
  • InfoShare Presentations (Post Grad Event Management)



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98