Skip to main content
iRubric: WSJ Article Discussion Board Rubric

iRubric: WSJ Article Discussion Board Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
WSJ Article Discussion Board Rubric 
This rubric is for evaluating student participation in weekly discussions of assigned Wall Street Journal readings. Inspiration for this rubric comes from a Teacherline rubric found at: http://www.pbs.org/teacherline/courses/common_documents/disc_assess.htm. This site also has a good set of instructions to participants offering guidance on contributing to a productive discussion.
Rubric Code: TX89B92
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric WSJ Article Discussion Board Rubric
This rubric is for evaluating student participation in weekly discussions of assigned Wall Street Journal readings.
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Quality and Timeliness

This is an assessment of the timeliness, quantity, and quality of discussion board posts. This includes writing quality and grammar.

Poor

Does not submit at least one post by Midnight Monday and/or does not submit at least two significant responses to other learners by the close of discussion forum at 5pm Friday.
Fair

Submits at least one thoughtful post by Midnight Monday and at least two significant responses to other learners by the close of discussion forum at 5pm Friday.
Good

Submits at least two thoughtful posts by Midnight Monday and at least two significant responses to other learners at various times (not just the last day) during the session.
Excellent

Submits two or more thoughtful posts by Midnight Monday and more than two significant responses to other learners at various times (not just the last day) during the session.
WSJ Article Discussion Board Rubric
  Poor

1 pts

Satisfactory

2 pts

Excellent

3 pts

N/A

(N/A)

Comprehension

This is an assessment of the level of understanding exhibited in the participant's posts.

Poor

Posts and responses show little evidence of knowledge and understanding of assigned reading.
Satisfactory

Posts and responses show evidence of knowledge and understanding of assigned reading.
Excellent

Posts and responses show evidence of knowledge and understanding of assigned reading. References to other relevant resources are brought into the discussion that show an in-depth understanding of the assigned reading.
N/A
Contribution to Learning of Others

This is an assessment of the participant's ability to stimulate meaningful discussion and generate thoughtful responses from others.

Poor

Posts do not attempt to elicit thoughtful responses from others and/or participant's responses do not build upon the ideas of others to take the discussion deeper.
Satisfactory

Posts attempt to elicit thoughtful responses from others and participant's responses build upon the ideas of others to take the discussion deeper.
Excellent

Posts elicit thoughtful responses from others and participant's responses build upon and integrate multiple views from others to take the discussion deeper.
N/A




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16