Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Group Presentation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Group Presentation
Informative Group Presentation
Group given topics to research for informative presentation. Group has to prepare a 10 minute presentation that has to be presented in front of the class. Presentation could be presented with supplemental visuals. Student teams determine level of formality (may be formal or informal)
Rubric Code:
TX7A967
By
BFulkerson
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Business
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Informative Presentation:
Poor
1 pts
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
2 pts
Good
3 pts
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
4 pts
Quality of Project
Poor
Project was not organized. Information presented was not clear. Project did not fully answer all the questions asked on the outline.<BR>
<BR>
There were no activities, diagrams, or handouts for the class.
Fair
Project was fairly organized. Information presented was clear. Project did not fully answer all the questions asked on the outline.<BR>
<BR>
There were no activities, diagrams, or handouts for the class.
Good
Project was extremely organized. Information presented was clear and interesting.Project did not fully answer all the questions asked on the outline.<BR>
<BR>
Students were given one of the following: activity, diagram, or handout.
Excellent
Project was extremely organized, interesting, and easy to follow. <BR>
<BR>
Project fully informed audience about the topic and showed advanced critical thinking and application of knowledge from within the program.<BR>
<BR>
Students were given one of the following: activity, diagram, or handout.
Oral Presentation
Poor
Presentation was not clearly audible and hard to hear. Visual presentation was very disorganized and hard to read. Group members did not ask for questions and were unable to answer questions asked by other students or the instructor.
Fair
Presentation was audible, but needs improvement on tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project could be better organized and easier to read. Group members were <BR>
not able to answer some questions when asked by instructor or other students.
Good
Presentation was audible. Good tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project was organized and easy to read.Group members were<BR>
able to answer most questions posed by instructor and other students.
Excellent
Presentation was presented in a professional way. Audio and visual aspects were perfect. Group members were able to answer all questions posed by the other students as well as the instructor.
Group work - Written report
Poor
Did not use time wisely when working together as a group. Group did not stay on task and did not work on project without constant prompting from instructor.
Fair
Needs improvement on how to use time wisely when working together in a group.Group basically stayed on task, but was not fully focused on project. Instructor may have had to speak to the group to keep them on task or problem solve/conflict resolution.
Good
Used time wisely when working together in group. Group was focused on task.<BR>
Asked questions when needed.
Excellent
Group stayed on task the entire class time allotted for the project. Group organized and able to complete project with no assistance from the instructor.
Preparedness
Poor
Students do not seem prepared to present.
Fair
Students seem to be pretty prepared but should have rehearsed more as a team.
Good
Students are somewhat prepared, and there appears to be some rehearsing. There may be some awkward transitions between speakers.
Excellent
Students show that they are completely prepared and that they have rehearsed before the presentation. Speaker content flows logically between all parties.
Professionalism on delivery
Poor
Little or no eye contact. Body language and posture poor.<BR>
<BR>
Format for presentation and/or written report are cohesive. Grammatical, language and format errors.<BR>
<BR>
Team outward appearance sloppy/unkempt.
Fair
Students make some eye contact, but entire room is not fully engaged, with most attention to the instructor.<BR>
<BR>
Written report standards meet minumum standards.<BR>
<BR>
Students are neatly groomed.
Good
Students make eye contact, but posture and confidence is lacking. There is some audience engagement. There is some relation to the written material.
Excellent
Students stand up straight, look confident, speak clearly and make eye contact during the entire presentation. Students engages entire audience through-out presentation.<BR>
Cohesiveness between presentation materials and written report demonstrate advanced application of learning.<BR>
Students are well groomed, in business attire or a team uniform.
Group Presentation
Poor
Only one or two persons in the group participate in the presentation.
Fair
Some group members participate.
Good
All group members participate, but it is evident that there is not equality is assigned topic delivery.
Excellent
All group members participate and help each other as needed.
Time Limit
Poor
Too short<BR>
(under 6 minutes)<BR>
<BR>
# of minutes<BR>
______________
Fair
Too long <BR>
(over 10 minutes)<BR>
<BR>
# of minutes<BR>
_______________
Good
N/A
Excellent
Within Time Frame (10 minutes)
Total
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
Keywords:
InfoShare Presentations
Subjects:
Business
Communication
Science
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Business rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.