Skip to main content
iRubric: Group Presentation rubric

iRubric: Group Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Group given topics to research for informative presentation. Group has to prepare a 10 minute presentation that has to be presented in front of the class. Presentation could be presented with supplemental visuals. Student teams determine level of formality (may be formal or informal)
Rubric Code: TX7A967
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Informative Presentation:
  Poor

1 pts

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

2 pts

Good

3 pts

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

4 pts

Quality of Project

Poor

Project was not organized. Information presented was not clear. Project did not fully answer all the questions asked on the outline.<BR>
<BR>
There were no activities, diagrams, or handouts for the class.
Fair

Project was fairly organized. Information presented was clear. Project did not fully answer all the questions asked on the outline.<BR>
<BR>
There were no activities, diagrams, or handouts for the class.
Good

Project was extremely organized. Information presented was clear and interesting.Project did not fully answer all the questions asked on the outline.<BR>
<BR>
Students were given one of the following: activity, diagram, or handout.
Excellent

Project was extremely organized, interesting, and easy to follow. <BR>
<BR>
Project fully informed audience about the topic and showed advanced critical thinking and application of knowledge from within the program.<BR>
<BR>
Students were given one of the following: activity, diagram, or handout.
Oral Presentation

Poor

Presentation was not clearly audible and hard to hear. Visual presentation was very disorganized and hard to read. Group members did not ask for questions and were unable to answer questions asked by other students or the instructor.
Fair

Presentation was audible, but needs improvement on tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project could be better organized and easier to read. Group members were <BR>
not able to answer some questions when asked by instructor or other students.
Good

Presentation was audible. Good tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project was organized and easy to read.Group members were<BR>
able to answer most questions posed by instructor and other students.
Excellent

Presentation was presented in a professional way. Audio and visual aspects were perfect. Group members were able to answer all questions posed by the other students as well as the instructor.
Group work - Written report

Poor

Did not use time wisely when working together as a group. Group did not stay on task and did not work on project without constant prompting from instructor.
Fair

Needs improvement on how to use time wisely when working together in a group.Group basically stayed on task, but was not fully focused on project. Instructor may have had to speak to the group to keep them on task or problem solve/conflict resolution.
Good

Used time wisely when working together in group. Group was focused on task.<BR>
Asked questions when needed.
Excellent

Group stayed on task the entire class time allotted for the project. Group organized and able to complete project with no assistance from the instructor.
Preparedness

Poor

Students do not seem prepared to present.
Fair

Students seem to be pretty prepared but should have rehearsed more as a team.
Good

Students are somewhat prepared, and there appears to be some rehearsing. There may be some awkward transitions between speakers.
Excellent

Students show that they are completely prepared and that they have rehearsed before the presentation. Speaker content flows logically between all parties.
Professionalism on delivery

Poor

Little or no eye contact. Body language and posture poor.<BR>
<BR>
Format for presentation and/or written report are cohesive. Grammatical, language and format errors.<BR>
<BR>
Team outward appearance sloppy/unkempt.
Fair

Students make some eye contact, but entire room is not fully engaged, with most attention to the instructor.<BR>
<BR>
Written report standards meet minumum standards.<BR>
<BR>
Students are neatly groomed.
Good

Students make eye contact, but posture and confidence is lacking. There is some audience engagement. There is some relation to the written material.
Excellent

Students stand up straight, look confident, speak clearly and make eye contact during the entire presentation. Students engages entire audience through-out presentation.<BR>
Cohesiveness between presentation materials and written report demonstrate advanced application of learning.<BR>
Students are well groomed, in business attire or a team uniform.
Group Presentation

Poor

Only one or two persons in the group participate in the presentation.
Fair

Some group members participate.
Good

All group members participate, but it is evident that there is not equality is assigned topic delivery.
Excellent

All group members participate and help each other as needed.
Time Limit

Poor

Too short<BR>
(under 6 minutes)<BR>
<BR>
# of minutes<BR>
______________
Fair

Too long <BR>
(over 10 minutes)<BR>
<BR>
# of minutes<BR>
_______________
Good

N/A
Excellent

Within Time Frame (10 minutes)
Total

Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent



Keywords:
  • InfoShare Presentations







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98