Skip to main content
iRubric: Robotics Rubric

iRubric: Robotics Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Robotics Rubric 
Robotic Engineering
This rubric is designed to assess the design of the team's robot.
Rubric Code: SXX3X4B
By miagallagher
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: K-5

Powered by iRubric Robot Design Rubric
  Needs Improvement

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Innovative Design
5 %

Needs Improvement

Design, drive train, and structure are standard.<BR>
<BR>
Manipulators/sensors used in expected ways, if used.<BR>
<BR>
Strategy for combining missions expected.<BR>
<BR>
Programming written as expected.
Fair

Design creative, unique use of drive train or structure.<BR>
<BR>
Manipulators/sensors used in unexpected ways, if used.<BR>
<BR>
Unique/creative strategy for coordinating missions.<BR>
<BR>
Programming tasks used in unexpected ways. <BR>
<BR>
(For this category, 1 of the 4 above is demonstrated)
Good

Design creative, uique use of drive train or structure.<BR>
<BR>
Manipulators/sensors used in unexpected ways, if used.<BR>
<BR>
Unique/creative strategy for coodinating missions.<BR>
<BR>
Programming tasks used in unexpected ways. <BR>
<BR>
(For this category, 2 of the 4 above are demonstrated)
Excellent

Design creative, unique use of drive train or structure.<BR>
<BR>
Manipulators/sensors used in unexpected ways, if used.<BR>
<BR>
Unique/creative strategy for coodinating missions.<BR>
<BR>
Programming tasks used in unexpected ways. <BR>
<BR>
(For this category, 1 done exceptionally or 3 of the 4 above demonstrated.)
Locomotion & Navigation
5 %

Needs Improvement

Difficulty going same distance on repeated missions.<BR>
<BR>
Too fast for accuracy, or too slow to accomplish mission.<BR>
<BR>
Turns inaccurate or inconsistent.<BR>
<BR>
Moves between tow points inconsistently.<BR>
<BR>
No effort to know position on table beyond distance and accurate turns.
Fair

Goes defined distances sometimes.<BR>
<BR>
Turns sometimes accurate.<BR>
<BR>
Sometimes moves between tow points consistently.<BR>
<BR>
Little or no effort to know position on table beyond distance and accurate turns.
Good

Goes defined distances most of the time.<BR>
<BR>
Not too fast for accuracy or too slow to accomplish mission.<BR>
<BR>
Turns reasonabley accurate and consistent.<BR>
<BR>
Allows for variables.<BR>
<BR>
Moves between two points with reasonable accuracy and consistency.<BR>
<BR>
May use various sensors.
Excellent

Goes defined distances efficiently.<BR>
<BR>
Adjusts speed, position sensing for optimum speed and accuracy.<BR>
<BR>
Turns accurately and consistently.<BR>
<BR>
Allows for variables (battery wear, obstacles).<BR>
<BR>
Moves between tow points with very good accuracy and consistency.<BR>
<BR>
May use various sensors.
Structural
5 %

Needs Improvement

Difficulty with robot assembly during demo.<BR>
<BR>
Base weak, falls apart when handled or run.<BR>
<BR>
Attachments, if used, weak and fall apart often; difficulty completing task; or overly complex. Robot design from book, little modification by team.
Fair

Robot assembly done with few errors.<BR>
<BR>
Robot base structure has some stabliity.<BR>
<BR>
Attachments, if used, difficult to apply; and /or not modular; not precise or not repeatable.<BR>
<BR>
Robot show signs of team's design ideas.
Good

Slow robot assembly, with no errors<BR>
<BR>
Robot base stable, but not robust.<BR>
<BR>
Attachments, if used, modular; function most of the time; and/or take some time to assemble; somewhat precese and /or repeatable.<BR>
<BR>
Robot designed by team.
Excellent

Robot assembles easily.<BR>
<BR>
Robot base stable and robust.<BR>
<BR>
Attachments, if used, modular, function as expected and easily added/removed from robot. Robot displays wide range of capabilities.<BR>
<BR>
Attachments, if used, performtasks extremely well and are repeatable.<BR>
<BR>
Robot designed by team; design is unique and creative.
Overall Design
10 %

Needs Improvement

Robots lack most critical design components: works, stays together, efficient parts use, attachments easy to add/remove, simpler than comparable robots.<BR>
<BR>
Few components work together; few components look like they belong together.
Fair

Robot lacks many critical design components: works, stays together, efficient parts use, attachments easy to add/remove, simpler than comparable robots.<BR>
<BR>
Some components work together; some components look like they belong together.
Good

Robot lacks some critical design components: works, stays together, efficient parts use attachments easy to add/remove, simpler than comparable robots.<BR>
<BR>
Most components work together; most compenents look like they belong together.
Excellent

Robot is elegant, complete system.<BR>
<BR>
All components work well together.<BR>
<BR>
All components look like they belong together.



Keywords:
  • Robot Design

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16