Skip to main content
iRubric: Modeling Real Life Situations "Group Rubric"

iRubric: Modeling Real Life Situations "Group Rubric"

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Modeling Real Life Situations "Group Rubric" 
Linear Equations
Rubric Code: SXCWWB5
By mtgarcia
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Math  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Modeling Real-life Situations
 

Novice

1 pts


Apprentice

2 pts


Practitioner

3 pts


Expert

4 pts

Word Problem
pts

1 ( x pts)

The real-life situation compares two plans, but do not show a rate of change for one or both plans. Mathematics is not needed to determine which is the better plan.
2 ( x pts)

The real-life situation compares two plans, but may not accurately be showing a rate of change for one or both of the plans. Mathematics is not needed to determine which is the better plan.
3 ( x pts)

The real-life situation compares two plans (showing rate of change for both). Mathematics may be used to determine which is the better plan.
4 ( x pts)

The real-life situation word problem clearly compares two plans (showing rate of change for both). Mathematics must be used to determine which is the better plan.
"Lets" are Assigned
pts

1 ( x pts)

The "lets" for each plan are inaccurate, incomplete, or missing.
2 ( x pts)

The "lets" for each plan are displayed, but may be missing 2 assignments.
3 ( x pts)

The "lets" for each plan are displayed, but is missing 1 assignment.
4 ( x pts)

The "lets" for each plan are accurately displayed.
Equations
pts

1 ( x pts)

Equations are given, but both are inaccurate.
2 ( x pts)

Equations for each plan are given, but one is inaccurate.
3 ( x pts)

Equations for each plan are written, but may not follow slope-intercept form.
4 ( x pts)

Equations for each plan are accurately written in slope-intercept form.
Tables
pts

1 ( x pts)

Tables is inaccurate. Equations may be solved correctly, but does not correlate with table.
2 ( x pts)

Tables may have 2 inaccuracies that interfere with final results. One or both equations are solved incorrectly.
3 ( x pts)

Tables for each plan are given, but may include 1 minor error but does not interfere with the graph. Shows a minimum of 1 equation worked out for each of the plans.
4 ( x pts)

Tables for each plan are accurate. Shows a minimum of 1 equation worked out for each of the plans.
Graph
pts

1 ( x pts)

Both lines are graphed incorrectly.
2 ( x pts)

Both lines are graphed, but one of the lines is graphed incorrectly.
3 ( x pts)

Both lines are accurately graphed.
4 ( x pts)

Both lines are neatly and accurately graphed (lines are seamless).

*Lines correspond to the equations and tables.
Labeling of Graph
pts

1 ( x pts)

Graph is labeled, but includes many inaccuracies that interfere with the reading of the graph. A legend is inaccurate or is missing.
2 ( x pts)

Graph is labeled, but includes a few inaccuracies that interfere with the reading of the graph. A legend is partially given.
3 ( x pts)

Graph is labeled, but may have one inaccuracy that does not interfere with overall reading of the graph. A legend is provided.
4 ( x pts)

Graph is accurately labeled: title, x and y axis are accurately labeled, and scaling of axes are appropriate. A legend is provided.
Verbal Explanation
pts

1 ( x pts)

Unable to justify which plan is the better deal. Poor or no connection is made.
2 ( x pts)

Justifies which plan is the better deal, but makes weak connections to the graph and their work.
3 ( x pts)

Justifies which plan is the better deal and makes connections to the graph and their work.
4 ( x pts)

Explicitly justifies which plan is the better deal and makes strong connections to the graph and their work.
Poster
pts

1 ( x pts)

YIKES! QUE PASO? Poster is not neat nor organized. Many sections are unlegiable or include mistakes making it difficult for audience to follow.
2 ( x pts)

EH! Poster is somewhat neat and organized, but 1-2 sections may be unlegiable or include mistakes making it difficult for audience to follow.
3 ( x pts)

NICE! Poster is mostly neat and organized for audience to follow.

Drawings, color, graph, tables, words etc are used to show understanding of the problem.
4 ( x pts)

WOW! Poster is neat and highly organized and made easy for audience to follow.

Drawing, color, graph, tables, words etc are used to show a complete understanding of the problem.
Group Presentation
pts

1 ( x pts)

All group members present, but do not show any understanding of problem. They fail to justify their answer, and do not use the poster.
2 ( x pts)

All group members participate and show somewhat an understanding of the problem. They are somewhat able to justify their answer, but do not use the poster.
3 ( x pts)

All group members participate and show an understanding of the problem. They are able to justify their answer using one method and refer to poster.
4 ( x pts)

All group members actively participate and demonstrate to have a deep understanding of the problem. They effectively justify their answer in more than one method and use their poster.



Keywords:
  • systems of equations

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16