Skip to main content
iRubric: Music History Research Paper rubric

iRubric: Music History Research Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Music History Research Paper 
Music History Research Paper
Research a composer or historical period from middle ages to 20th century classical. Submit one 5-7 Paragraph paper, double spaced. Include a works cited page with at least 3 resources used researching the paper. Paper will be graded on quality of research to support the topic, effective use of information gained through research, credibility of sources, content, grammar and mechanics, and bibliography.
Rubric Code: SX935X6
By waters1108
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Music  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Music History Research Paper
  Excellent

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Poor

(N/A)

Quality of research
25 pts

Excellent

--Cited 3 or more sources
--Sources reliable and properly cited.
--All information relevant to topic
--Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic.
--Research in-depth and the beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.
Good

--Cited at least 2 sources
--Sources mostly reliable. Citation errors minor.
--Most information relevant to thesis.
--Sufficient information provided
--Research of sufficent depth.
Fair

--Failed to cite at least 2 sources
--Source reliability questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source.
--Some information relevant to thesis.
--Information provided to support some elements of topic
--Surface research.
Poor

--Failed to cite sources
--Source reliability questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source.
--Some information relevant to thesis.
--Information provided to support some elements of topic
--Surface research.
Content
30 pts

Excellent

--an appropriate topic for research.
--Good Support of topic. Discussed Composer/Genre in depth and covered all important events.
--Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment.
--Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
Good

--questionable topic for research.
--Support for topic sufficient, Discussion of Composer/Genre lacking depth and covered most important events.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Fair

--poor topic for research.
--Support for topic barely sufficient, Discussion of Composer/Genre is very vague and very few important events were covered.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Poor

--Topic doesn't meet specifications.
--Support for topic not sufficient, Discussion of Composer/Genre is not clear and no important events were covered.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Works Cited
15 pts

Excellent

--All sources properly cited in Works Cited page.
-- No more than 2 errors in format or punctuation.
Good

--All sources properly cited in Works Cited page.
-- 4 errors in format or punctuation.
Fair

--Not all sources properly cited in Works Cited page.
-- More than than 6 errors in format or punctuation.
Poor

No works cited page
Grammar and Mechanics
15 pts

Excellent

--Consistent and appropriate voice.
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No More than 2 spelling errors
-- No more than 2 punctuation or capitalization errors.
--Met all style and min/max paragraph requirements
Good

-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No more than 4 spelling errors.
-- Fewer than 4 punctuation or capitalization errors.
--Met most style and min/max paragraph requirements
Fair

-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--More than 6 spelling errors.
-- More than 6 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Failed to meet style and/or min/max paragraph requirements
Poor

-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--More than 8 spelling errors.
-- More than 7 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Failed to meet style and/or min/max paragraph requirements
Format
15 pts

Excellent

--Paper is at least 5 paragraphs in length
--Title page is properly formatted
Good

--Paper is at least 4 paragraphs in length
--Title page is properly formatted
Fair

--Paper is at least 3 paragraphs in length
--Title page is close to the proper format
Poor

--Paper is less than 3 paragraphs in length
--Title page is missing



Keywords:
  • Research paper - emphasis on relevance of research



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98