RCampus - Learning, ePortfolios, Assessments, Outcomes
Enter your login name here, or click here to go to the login page.
Enter your password:
forgot?   | click here to create a free account.
iRubric: APA STYLE REFERENCES PAPER rubric

iRubric: APA STYLE REFERENCES PAPER rubric

preview rubric

 

edit print email Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run apply to... delete

APA STYLE REFERENCES PAPER

  Derived from rubric: APA STYLE REFERENCES PAPER
built by isabel_rod

Rubric Code: SX92X79
APA STYLE REFERENCES PAPER
ready Ready to use    public Public Rubric

Directly link to this rubric or embed it on your website:
url:
link:
embed:
Keywords: (None)
Categories: Subjects: History   Psychology  
Types: Writing  
Grade Levels:

Powered by iRubric CRITERION
  UNACCEPTABLE
2 pts
SUBSTANDARD
3 pts
SATISFACTORY
4 pts
EXCEPTIONAL
5 pts
REFERENCES Page
10 pts POINTS * 2
UNACCEPTABLE

References page contains no academic resources, only internet webpages. <BR>
<BR>
Lack of APA guidelines for references provided.
SUBSTANDARD

References page contains only one academic resource.<BR>
<BR>
Many errors of APA guidelines: double space, 12 pt. font, hanging indent.
SATISFACTORY

References page contains: 3 total but one less of academic resource or text reference. Follows most APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, hanging indent.
EXCEPTIONAL

References page contains more than required academic reference (3) and text reference.<BR>
Follows APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, hanging indent.
Paper Length
5 pts
UNACCEPTABLE

Less than 2 pages. Requirement not met.
SUBSTANDARD

2-5 page minimum not met. Alterations were visibly noticeable in paper.
SATISFACTORY

2-5 page minimum but the strength of the argument could have benefitted from longer length.
EXCEPTIONAL

2-5 page requirement met with no alterations to margins, font type or size
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
10 pts POINTS * 2
UNACCEPTABLE

Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.<BR>
<BR>
Language uses undefined jargon, or conversational tone.
SUBSTANDARD

Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors. <BR>
<BR>
Language lacks clarity or includes the use of undefined jargon, or conversational tone.
SATISFACTORY

Few grammatical errors, but sentences could be clearer and more precise.
EXCEPTIONAL

Rules of grammar, usage and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. <BR>
<BR>
Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Organization
10 pts POINTS * 2
UNACCEPTABLE

Information is not organized into paragraphs with introductory sentences, details or concluding sentences. <BR>
Lack of structure detracts from the message of the writer.
SUBSTANDARD

Information is organized into paragraphs but the information is not detailed. Each paragraph has an introductory sentence, with 2 or less details and a concluding sentence. Paragraph transitions do not flow.
SATISFACTORY

Information is organized in well-constructed paragraphs. Each paragraph has an introductory sentence, at least 3 details and a concluding sentence. Paragraph transitions are logical.
EXCEPTIONAL

Information is very organized into execellently constructed parapraphs. <BR>
<BR>
Each paragraph has an introductory sentence, at least 3 details and a concluding sentence.
Introduction / Content & Discussion
25 pts POINTS * 5
UNACCEPTABLE

No Background information.<BR>
<BR>
Paragraph does not introduce topic. No thesis present. Major points are addressed but not well supported or discussed.
SUBSTANDARD

No Backgrround information.<BR>
<BR>
The reader is introduced to the thesis. Content is accurate and mostly complete.
SATISFACTORY

Some Background information is evident.<BR>
<BR>
The reader is introduced to the thesis. Major points need to be stated more clearly and be better supported.
EXCEPTIONAL

Great use of background information. Purpose of the writing is clear. Ideas and concepts are presented in a clear and understandable manner.<BR>
<BR>
The reader is introduced to the thesis.
Conclusion Ideas/Content
15 pts POINTS * 3
UNACCEPTABLE

Information has little to do with the main topic.<BR>
<BR>
Analyses are not well organized or clear.<BR>
<BR>
Offered no personal analysis.
SUBSTANDARD

Infomation clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given.<BR>
Personal analysis followed script from the text book or source material.
SATISFACTORY

Information clearly relates to the main <BR>
topic. <BR>
<BR>
It provides some supporting details and/or examples. Analyses not as clear as they could be.
EXCEPTIONAL

Provides exceptional and thought provoking analysis that directly addresses details and/or examples of the main topic.
PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY & LANGUAGE
15 pts POINTS * 2
UNACCEPTABLE

Psychological language is not used. Known theory within psychology, absent. Emphasis on example obscures science of psychology as necessary focus.
SUBSTANDARD

Lack of naming, definition of psychological theory & a minimum of 1 concept with an example.
SATISFACTORY

Lack of naming, definition of psychological theory & a minimum of 2 concepts and examples.
EXCEPTIONAL

Theory and or theorist named; theory summarized with a minimum of 3 named concepts that are defined with relevant examples provided.
TIMELINESS
10 pts POINTS * 2 elec.<BR>
Deduction up to 10 points, manual.
UNACCEPTABLE

VERY LATE <BR>
AFTER CUT-OFF <BR>
(- 10)
SUBSTANDARD

LATE <BR>
NEXT CLASS<BR>
( - 5)
SATISFACTORY

ON-TIME <BR>
(+ 5)
EXCEPTIONAL

EARLY <BR>
(+ 10)



Discuss this rubric



Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Bookmark this page:   RCampus RCampus   twit this twitter   delicious del.icio.us   digg Digg   facebook Facebook  
About Education Sites & Communities My Account Support
About RCampus
Terms of Use
Security & Privacy
Site Map
Case Studies
Classrooms
ePortfolios
Rubrics
Coursework
Grades
Book Exchange
Tutors
Website Gallery
Basic Groups
Study Groups
Club websites
Faculty Groups
My Account Settings
My Messages
My Calendar
My To-do List
My Favorites
My Documents
Free Sign up
Log in
Help & FAQ
Contact Us
Copyright © 2017 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.