Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Group Media Bias Project rubric

iRubric: Group Media Bias Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Group Media Bias Project Groups will deeply analyze one news source for inherit bias. They will then report their findings to the class so that their peers can be informed about that organization. Rubric Code: SX82235 By givenjames250 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

News Organization Review
	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Article 1 Analysis	Good Explores all 6 biases and Provides a thorough, accurate analysis of the author’s justification of the worth and significance of the study. A claim, evidence, and deep commentary is provided for each bias.	Fair Explores all 6 biases and provides a description, but only minimal analysis, of the author’s justification of the worth and significance of the study. claim, evidence, and proficient commentary is provided for each bias.	Poor Is missing one or more of the biases or student does not accurately assess the author’s arguments justifying the study. Either a claim, evidence, or commentary is missing for each of the biases.
Article 2 Analysis	Good Explores all 6 biases and Provides a thorough, accurate analysis of the author’s justification of the worth and significance of the study. A claim, evidence, and deep commentary is provided for each bias.	Fair Explores all 6 biases and provides a description, but only minimal analysis, of the author’s justification of the worth and significance of the study. claim, evidence, and proficient commentary is provided for each bias.	Poor Is missing one or more of the biases or student does not accurately assess the author’s arguments justifying the study. Either a claim, evidence, or commentary is missing for each of the biases.
Video Analysis	Good Explores all 6 biases and Provides a thorough, accurate analysis of the author’s justification of the worth and significance of the study. A claim, evidence, and deep commentary is provided for each bias.	Fair Explores all 6 biases and provides a description, but only minimal analysis, of the author’s justification of the worth and significance of the study. claim, evidence, and proficient commentary is provided for each bias.	Poor Is missing one or more of the biases or student does not accurately assess the author’s arguments justifying the study. Either a claim, evidence, or commentary is missing for each of the biases.
Bias Review of Organization	Good Review is at least 500 words and discuses all 6 biases. Biases are bolded and are summorized in thourough manner. News organization is ranked from on a scale of 1-10 and multiple rationales and evidences are provided to justify score.	Fair Review is at least 500 words and discuses all 6 biases found in analysis portions of assignment. Biases are bolded and are summarized in sufficient manner. News organization is ranked from on a scale of 1-10 and proper rationale and evidence is provided to justify score.	Poor Review not 500 or does not discuss all 6 biases. Biases are not bolded or summorized in all-encompassing manner. News organization is not ranked on a scale of 1-10 and insufficient rationale and evidence is provided to justify score.
Presentation	Good ♦ Presentation is clever and original ♦ Engaging; captures interest of audience ♦ Appropriate variety of visual aids ♦ Visual aids add to or clarify presentation ♦ Each presenter speaks clearly and loudly; good eye contact; appropriate body language Members contribute equally to the presentation	Fair ♦ Presentation is at times clearly presented ♦ Presentation is at times interesting to audience ♦ Limited use of visual aids ♦ Visual aids do not clarify or add the presentation ♦ Presenter is hard to hear; little eye contact; poor body language Some members did not contribute equally to the presentation	Poor ♦ Little creativity used; bland ♦ Presentation is hard to follow; poorly organized ♦ No use of visual aids ♦ Presenter cannot be heard; no eye contact; poor body language Some members did not contribute to the presentation
Organization	Good ♦ Takes initiative in helping the group get organized and setting times and places to meet ♦ Product is extremely well organized with an introduction, body, and conclusion ♦ Has realistic, prioritized, and measurable goals Highly productive in accomplishing assignment	Fair ♦ Works agreeably with partner(s) concerning organization and times and places to meet ♦ Product is organized with an introduction, body, and conclusion ♦ Goals are established, but some are too general Accomplished basic assignment	Poor ♦ Did not meet partner(s) at agreed times or places ♦ Lack of organization; choppy and confusing; format difficult to follow ♦ No goals established Does not accomplish assignment
Collaboration	Good The teammates always worked from others’ ideas. It was evident that all of the group members contributed equally to the presentation.	Fair The teammates worked from others’ ideas most of the time. And it seems like every did some work, but some people are carrying the presentation.	Poor The teammates never worked from others’ ideas. It seems as though only a few people worked on the presentation.

Subjects:

English

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More English rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16