Skip to main content
iRubric: Sample Discussion Rubric

iRubric: Sample Discussion Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Sample Discussion Rubric 
Rubric Code: S95XC6
By weasterling
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Discussion Rubric
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Discussion Content (relevancy)

Poor

Most of the posts mostly do not meet expectations of the group and the instructor for the quality, accuracy, verifiability, and relevancy of the material discussed. Also, posts are usually not on topic and/or do not move the discussion forward in a new or helpful way.
Fair

Post/replies for this week only partially meet expectations of the group and the instructor for the quality, accuracy, verifiability, and relevancy of the material discussed. Posts are always on topic and provide new content
Good

All posts for this week meet expectations of the group and the instructor for the quality, accuracy, verifiability, and relevancy of the material discussed. Posts are always on topic and provide new content
Excellent

All posts for this week EXCEED expectations of the group and the instructor for the quality, accuracy, verifiability, and relevancy of the material discussed. Posts are always on topic and provide new mcontent. Content is specifically refreshing and insightful.
Quality of Work/Posts

Poor

Posts/replies for this week mostly do not meet group and instructor expectations for quality of writing, discussion, argument, etc. Good logic, grammar, argumentation, respectful engagement of peers, and an attention to detail is present.
Fair

Posts/replies for this week only partially meet group and instructor expectations for quality of writing, discussion, argument, etc. Good logic, grammar, argumentation, respectful engagement of peers, and an attention to detail is present.
Good

Posts for this week meet group and instructor expectations for quality of writing, discussion, argument, etc. Good logic, grammar, argumentation, respectful engagement of peers, and an attention to detail is present.
Excellent

Posts for this week EXCEED group and instructor expectations for quality of writing, discussion, argument, etc. Good logic, grammar, argumentation, respectful engagement of peers, and an attention to detail is profoundly present.
Discussion Roles: Lead/Follow/Reply

Poor

Posts/replies for this week mostly do not meet group expectations for discussion roles participants will take this week. Also, roles mostly are not assumed in a way that is respectful of others, and leadership in the forum most likely is not being displayed.
Fair

Posts/replies for this week only partially meet group expectations for discussion roles participants will take this week. Also, roles are not always assumed in a way that is respectful of others, and leadership in the forum may not be displayed.
Good

All posts for this week meet group expectations for discussion roles participants will take this week. Roles are assumed in a way that is respectful of others, and leadership in the forum is displayed.
Excellent

All posts for this week EXCEED group expectations for the roles participants will take this week. Multiple roles are assumed in a way that is respectful of others, and leadership in the forum is displayed.
Participation Cycles

Poor

Participation this week mostly does not meet the agreed-upon group expectations for participation frequency, number of posts/replies, and timing. See your group's expectations for more information.
Fair

Participation this week only partially meets the agreed-upon group expectations for participation frequency, number of posts/replies, and timing. See your group's expectations for more information.
Good

Participation this week meets group expectations for participation frequency, number of posts/replies, and timing. See your group's expectations for more information.
Excellent

Participation this week EXCEEDS group expectations (see week 1 forum) for participation frequency, number of posts/replies, and timing. See your group's expectations for more information.
Quality of Participation

Poor

Interactions this week with group members mostly do not meet group expectations, fail to meet the instructor's written instructions for the week, and/or do not represent the dispositions of a current or future professional.
Fair

Interactions this week with group members only partially meet group expectations, meet the instructor's expectations, and are reflective of the dispositions of a current or future professional.
Good

Interactions this week with group members meet group expectations, meet the instructor's expectations, and are reflective of the dispositions of a current or future professional.
Excellent

Interactions this week with group members EXCEED group expectations, meet the instructor's expectations, and are reflective of the dispositions of a current or future professional. True leadership and co-ownership of the forums is evident. All forums are civil, respectful, helpful to others in the forum, and show a sense of co-ownership of the forum. Not only that, but the student fosters these things through their participation




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98