RRRRN ProjectRubric
|
| |
Fair
1 pts
|
Good
2 pts
|
Excellent
3 pts
|
Research / Wiki
|
Knowledge Gained
|
Fair
Some knoweldge gained - however contains many errors. Individual team project and wiki content is confusing.
|
Good
Can satisfactorily explain habitat concept. No factual errors. Individual team project and wiki content is satisfactory.
|
Excellent
Demonstrates in-depth knowledge about habitats. Relevant and effective individual team project and wiki.
|
Content Accuracy
editing, spelling, grammar
|
Fair
More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar.
Some use of inappropriate abbreviations.
|
Good
1-2 errors in spelling or grammar. No use of inappropriate abbreviations.
|
Excellent
No misspellings or grammatical errors and no use of inappropriate abbreviations.
|
Graphic Organizers
cite sources and web layout organizers
|
Fair
Research g.o. incomplete or not handed in. Many facts missing. Did not follow web layout organizer.
|
Good
Research g.o. handed in.
Most facts are complete. Mostly followed web layout organizer.
|
Excellent
Completes all facts and hands in Research g.o. Followed web layout organizer.
|
Citation
use cite sources g.o.
|
Fair
Citation g.o. incomplete or not handed in. Uses improper format or does not give credit to most sources.
|
Good
Uses proper format & gives credit to most sources with minor errors. Citation g.o. handed in.
|
Excellent
Uses proper format & gives credit to ALL
sources. Citation g.o. handed in.
|
Web Page Design
|
Topic
what are you trying to "say"?
|
Fair
The topic of the page is unclear and does not have a definite idea.
|
Good
n/a
|
Excellent
The topic is clear to all readers, and is on track with the content.
|
Content
|
Fair
Purpose of web page is unclear. Little to no content is presented. Bare minimum research is presented.
|
Good
Purpose of web page is becoming clear. Research is clearly shown and displayed.
|
Excellent
Purpose of web page understood. Topic presented clearly.
|
Design
layout, color, format, images
|
Fair
The page has very little design. The layout is unorganized, lacks purpose, & focus.
|
Good
The web page is appealing, but lacks one or two design criteria. The layout has some organization, but still lacks a clear purpose and focus.
|
Excellent
The web page draws attention by utilizing design criteria & great use of images. The layout is organized and has both a purpose, & focus.
|
Spelling
|
Fair
Grammar errors, fragments, & punctuation errors.
|
Good
More then two punctuation & spelling errors.
|
Excellent
No errors occur in sentences, & punctuation is excellent.
|
Creativity
|
Fair
Littl evidence of original thinking or individual team project not complete.
|
Good
Shows some evidence of critical thought in creating individual team project.
|
Excellent
Shows clear evidence of critical thinking & an original or creative approach towards individual team project.
|
Team Collaboration
|
Fair
Minimal collection of material or development of ideas. Moderate input to research, wiki, & webpage; little comment on others' work.
|
Good
Mostly interacted, collected some information, shared ideas, & contributed to project. Adequate input to individual research, wiki & webpage.
|
Excellent
Continuously interacted, discussed, collected a great deal of information, shared ideas, offered assistance, contributed to project, posed questions to team.
Constant input to entire team project.
|
Ready to use
Public Rubric
RCampus
twitter
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
email a friend
help on this page