Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Language and Culture Presentational Speaking rubric

iRubric: Language and Culture Presentational Speaking rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Language and Culture Presentational Speaking Language and Culture Presentational Speaking Rubric Code: S2X99X7 By m11nunez Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Foreign Languages Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

Cultural Comparison
	No evidence 1 pts	Developing 2 pts	Proficient 3 pts	Excels 4 pts
Treatment of Topic Meets requirements of the task	No evidence Unsuitable treatment of topic within the context of the task	Developing Suitable treatment of topic within the context of the task	Proficient Generally effective treatment of topic within the context of the task	Excels Effective treatment of topic within the context of the task
Comparison of Cultures	No evidence Presents information only about the student's own community or only about the target culture, and may not include examples	Developing Presents information only about the student's own community or only about the target culture, including a few supporting details and examples	Proficient Compares the student's own community with the target culture, including some supporting details and mostly relevant examples	Excels Clearly compares the student's community with the target culture, including supporting details and relevant examples
Understanding the target culture	No evidence Demonstrates a limited understanding of the target culture; includes several inaccuracies	Developing Demonstrates a basic understanding of the target culture, despite inaccuracies	Proficient Demonstrates some understanding of the target culture, despite minor inaccuracies	Excels Demonstrates understanding of the target culture, despite a few minor inaccuracies
Organization	No evidence Little or no organization; absence of transitional elements and cohesive devices	Developing Some organization; limited use of transitional elements or cohesive devices	Proficient Organized presentation; some effective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices	Excels Organized presentation; effective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices
Comprehensibility	No evidence Barely understandable, with frequent or significant errors that impede comprehensibility	Developing Generally understandable, with errors that may impede comprehensibility	Proficient Fully understandable, with some errors which do not impede comprehensibility	Excels Fully understandable, with ease and clarity of expression; occasional errors do not impede comprehensibility
Vocabulary and idiomatic language	No evidence Very few vocabulary resources	Developing Appropriate but basic and limited vocabulary and idiomatic language	Proficient Varied and generally appropriate vocabulary and idiomatic language	Excels Accuracy and variety in grammar, syntax, and usage, with few errors
Register	No evidence Use of register is generally inappropriate for the presentation	Developing Use of register may be inappropriate for the presentation with several shifts	Proficient Generally consistent use of register appropriate for the presentation, except for occasional shifts	Excels Mostly consistent use of register appropriate for the presentation
Grammar, syntax, and usagea Focus:	No evidence Limited control of grammar, syntax, and usage	Developing Some control of grammar, syntax, and usage	Proficient General control of grammar, syntax, and usage	Excels Accuracy and variety in grammar, syntax, and usage, with few errors
Pronunciation, intonation, pacing	No evidence Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response difficult to comprehend; errors impede comprehensibility	Developing Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response generally comprehensible; errors occasionally impede comprehensibility	Proficient Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response mostly comprehensible; errors do not impede comprehensibility	Excels Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response comprehensible; errors do not impede comprehensibility
Clarification or self-correction	No evidence Clarification or self-correction (if present) usually does not improve comprehensibility	Developing Clarification or self-correction (if present) sometimes improves comprehensibility	Proficient Clarification or self-correction (if present) usually improves comprehensibility	Excels Clarification or self-correction (if present) improves comprehensibility

Keywords:

AP, Presentational Speaking, Cultural Comparison

Subjects:

Foreign Languages

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Foreign Languages rubrics

More Assessment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16