Skip to main content
iRubric: Group Presentation Rubric

iRubric: Group Presentation Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Group Presentation Rubric 
Group Presentation Rubric
This rubric is designed to assess the presentation of the group activity. The rubric should consider the performance of the group as a whole, as well as individual contributions.
Rubric Code: RXX365A
By evaflores
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Group Presentation Rubric
  Excellent

3 pts

Good

2 pts

Fair

1 pts

Poor

0 pts

Teamwork in Working Session 1

Excellent

The group worked very well with each other and they communicate to each other using only English.
Good

The group worked well with each other and communicated sometimes in English. Some members participated slightly more than others.
Fair

The group didn't work with each other and didn't communicate in English. Some members participated slightly more than others.
Poor

Group did not work well together. There were obvious miscommunications, both in English and Spanish.
Teamwork in Working Session 2

Excellent

The group worked very well with each other and they communicate to each other using only English.
Good

The group worked well with each other and communicated sometimes in English. Some members participated slightly more than others.
Fair

The group didn't work with each other and didn't communicate in English. Some members participated slightly more than others.
Poor

Group did not work well together. There were obvious miscommunications, both in English and Spanish.
Teamwork in Working Session 3

Excellent

The group worked very well with each other and they communicate to each other using only English.
Good

The group worked well with each other and communicated sometimes in English. Some members participated slightly more than others.
Fair

The group didn't work with each other and didn't communicate in English. Some members participated slightly more than others.
Poor

Group did not work well together. There were obvious miscommunications, both in English and Spanish.
Organization

Excellent

Presentation was very organized and was very easy to follow.
Good

Presentation was fairly organized and pretty followable.
Fair

Presentation was not clearly organized.
Poor

Presentation lacked organization.
Use of English

Excellent

Proper use of new words and grammar is employed consistently throughout the assignment.
Good

A few vocabulary or grammar mistakes are evident, but do not diminish the meaning of the answer.
Fair

There are numerous spelling or grammatical errors, making the presentation difficult to understand.
Poor

There are numerous spelling or grammar errors, making the answer impossible to understand. There is no connection.
Content and Truthfulness

Excellent

Group members had a stronghold on the content and content was thoroughly addressed. No mistakes were made with regard to content knowledge. True facts.
Good

Most of the group members has a solid understanding of the content. Content missing minor elements or contained minor errors.
Fair

Group members had only a superficial understanding of content. Several mistakes were made during the presentation.
Poor

Group members had little to no understanding of the content addressed in the presentation. No true facts.
Creativity

Excellent

Group presentation is extremely creative with evidence of a creative use of technology and an enthusiastic and innovative delivery which keeps audience engaged.
Good

Group presentation is creative with evidence of creative use of technology and an enthusiastic delivery.
Fair

Group presentation attempts to achieve originality but does not engage the audience.
Poor

Group presentation shows no original and creativity.
Visual Support

Excellent

Visual aids used were used effectively throughout presentation. Group members used visual aids as a supplement, not as a crutch.
Good

Visual aids used were somewhat effective, but weren't used consistently thoughout presentation.
Fair

Visual aids used did not support verbal presentation. They lacked information, or groups members read from them or included to many specific words on slides instead of big thematic ideas
Poor

Visual aids were not used properly.
Bibliographic references

Excellent

Several citations were properly referenced within the presentation and used to support evidence.
Good

Some citations were properly referenced within the presentation and used to support evidence.
Fair

Few citations were used with no explanation of the importance of the source material.
Poor

No citations are cited with not connection to supporting arguments.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16