- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: People of Destiny Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
People of Destiny Rubric Powerpoint Presentation Rubric Rubric Code: RXW6X82 By mldupont Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Presentation Grade Levels: K-5

People of Destiny Rubric
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Reading Journal	Excellent Reading journal is complete. Entries were consistently thoroughly completed, thoughtful and reflective.	Good Reading journal is complete. Entries were frequently thoroughly completed, thoughtful and reflective	Fair Reading journal is complete. Entries were sometimes thoroughly completed, thoughtful and reflective	Poor Reading journal is incomplete. Entries were seldom completed, thoughtful or reflective.
Reflective Essay	Excellent Essay clearly explains student's feeling about the legacy of Columbus. Student uses lots of evidence from the text to support opinion	Good Essay explains student's feeling about the legacy of Columbus. Student uses evidence from the text to support opinion	Fair Essay talks about Christopher Columbus. Uses some evidence from text, but evidence or feeling about legacy is not clear to the reader	Poor Essay refers to the life of Columbus. No evidence from the text is used to support thinking.
Hyperstudio Presentation	Excellent All 4 pages were produced creatively and effectively.	Good At least 3 pages were produced creatively and reflectively	Fair 2 pages were created	Poor 1-2 pages were created.
Cooperation/Participation	Excellent Student participates enthusiastically in whole group and partner reading discussions and was engaged in all of the daily reading assignments.	Good Student participates in whole group and partner reading discussions and was engaged in most of the daily reading assignments.	Fair Student participates in some of the whole group and partner reading discussions and was engaged in some of the daily reading assignments.	Poor Student rarely participates in the whole group and partner reading discussions and remained frequently off task during independent reading times.