- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Peer Review/Editing - CRAFT rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Peer Review/Editing - CRAFT Peer Editing Narrative Rubric Code: RX938BA By AmyMTu Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Writing Grade Levels: K-5

Peer Editing
	Excellent (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Needs Work (N/A)
Establishes a problem	Excellent The author established a situation or problem.	Good The author attempted to establish a problem.	Needs Work The author did not establish a problem.
Structure of a Narrative	Excellent The author included all parts of a narrative.	Good The author attempted to include parts of a narrative.	Needs Work The author does not include structure of a narrative.
Details and dialogue	Excellent The author included included excellent details and dialogue to describe actions, thoughts and feelings of characters.	Good The author includes some details and dialogue to describe actions, thoughts and feelings of characters	Needs Work The author did not include details and dialogue to describe actions, thoughts and feelings of characters
Logical Order	Excellent The story flows naturally. The story is sequenced in an order that makes sense.	Good Most of the story flows in a logical order. Most parts make sense.	Needs Work The story does not flow in a logical order. Parts of the story do not make sense.
Transition Words	Excellent The author used words and phrases throughout the story to connect sequence of events.	Good The author used some words and phrases to connect sequence of events.	Needs Work The author did not use words and phrases to connect the sequence of events.
Sensory Details	Excellent The author used specific words and phrases to describe experiences and events.	Good The author attempts to use words and phrases to describe experiences and events.	Needs Work The author does not use words and phrases to describe experiences and events.
Conclusion is Logical	Excellent The author included a conclusion that is logical and based on the events in the story.	Good The author attempts to provide a conclusion based on events from the story.	Needs Work The author does not include a conclusion OR the conclusion is not logical based on events.