- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Atomic Theory Timeline rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Atomic Theory Timeline Poster Presentation rubric Rubric Code: RX8CX4W By jmedrano16 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Computers Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8

Future Home/Life Board
	Poor 2 pts	Fair 4 pts	Good 6 pts	Exceeds 8 pts
Content Knowledge	Poor The poster is lacking in elements required. There are many gaps in information presented. Confusing.	Fair Does not have all of the relevant information of the poster. There is not enough information presented. Information is presented in an unorganized fashion and may be hard to understand.	Good Poster includes all relevant information; however, it is not well-organized or easily understood..	Exceeds The poster includes all information relevant to the topic. The poster is creative, clear and concise. The student added information above what was taught in class or required for assignment.
Work quality/effort	Poor Work is done with little effort, quality is not what the learner is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete.	Fair Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not what the learner is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed.	Good The work was done with good effort that shows what the learner is capable of. It is evident that time was put into this poster and presentation.	Exceeds The work done exceeds all expectations and shows that the learner is proud of his/her work. The effort that was put into this task is the best it can be by the learner.
Cooperation	Poor Students did not work well together and only one of the group members did the work.	Fair Both students worked well together but did not put forth the best collective effort on the poster	Good Both students worked together to complete the project and divided the tasks equally but had noticeable some mistakes on the poster board.	Exceeds Both students put forth a collaborative effort and shared the amount of work necessary to complete the poster
Presentation	Poor During presentation: most students did not speak, lack of voice projection, lack of eye contact and posture.	Fair During presentation: some students did not speak, some lack of voice projection, some lack eye contact and posture.	Good During presentation: 1 students did not speak, most showed good voice projection,eye contact and posture.	Exceeds During presentation: all students presented, all showed excellent voice projection,eye contact and posture.