Skip to main content
iRubric: Case Study Rubric

iRubric: Case Study Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Case Study Rubric 
Rubric for Management and Business courses
Rubric Code: RX6C8C3
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Case Study Title
100 %
  Poor

3 pts

Fair

5 pts

Good

8 pts

Well Done

10 pts

SCORE

(N/A)

Writing  principles  and practices 
10 %

Poor

Writing is unfocused, lacks structure/organization or contains serious errors; lacks detail and relevant information; 6 or more grammatical and spelling errors
Fair

Writing has some clarity, weak organization, gives some detail and relevant information, has 3-5
grammatical or spelling errors
Good

Clearly and concisely written following an outline; includes relevant details and information; contains only 1-2 grammatical/spelling errors
Well Done

Writing is thoroughly done according to the guidelines for the assignment. No grammatical/spelling errors.
SCORE
Problem Identification/Summary
10 %

Abstract, Overview, Executive Summary

Poor

Identifies the symptons of the problem, not accurately identifying the problem, the summary likes clarity
Fair

Correct problem identification, but summary is unfocused
Good

Clear introductory paragraph identifying the problem; consisely states the most salient points raised in the case
Well Done

A well-developed introductory paragraph that describes the paper's purpose and objectives including the specific topics to be addressed.
SCORE
Question Responses
15 %

Poor

Makes little or no connection between the issues identified and the concepts studied in class. Vaguely addresses the questions. Answers appear to be taken directly from the case study and lack citations.
Fair

Makes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between the issues and concepts studied in class; does not adequately address all questions. Some of the answers appear to be based on published material and lack citations.
Good

Makes appropriate connections between the issues identified and the concepts studied in class; answers all questions. In-text citations are apprpriately used in several places; however, there were areas that appeared to need in-text citations that lack them.
Well Done

All aspects of each question were addressed clearly and thoroughly. References were made not only to the case issues; but also to the concepts learned in this course.
SCORE
Paper Mechanics/Format
5 %

Poor

Paper meets 1-2 of the criteria: typed, double spaced, citations, 12 pt font and two pages in length
Fair

Paper meets 3 to 4 of the criteria: typed, double spaced, citations, 12 pt font and two pages in length
Good

Paper is typed, using a 12 pt font, double-spaced with correct citations and is 2 pages in length
Well Done

Paper is prepared exactly as instructed in the term project guidelines. In-text citations were appropriately inserted within the Body of the document and were tied to the items listed on the Works Cited page. Correct page length was used.
SCORE
Section 1
15 %

Company history, development & growth; internal strength and weaknesses, external environment, S.W.O.T. analysis, corporate-level, business-level strategies, company strucure & control systems.

Poor

Little or no discussion about any of items in this section. Minor reference to 1 to 2 items.
Fair

Some discussion, albeit general, about 3 or more items in this section tied to the case study
Good

Several section topics were discussed in well-written passages regarding the case.
Well Done

All sections that were outlined in the assignment guidelines were discussed regarding the case.
SCORE
Section 2
15 %

The Internal Strengths and Weakness described about the company or inherent in the situation involving the case study

Poor

Little or no discussion about any of items in this section. Minor reference to 1 to 2 items.
Fair

Some discussion, albeit general, about 3 or more items in this section tied to the case study
Good

Several section topics were discussed in well-written passages regarding the case.
Well Done

All sections that were outlined in the assignment guidelines were discussed regarding the case.
SCORE
Section 3
15 %

The nature of the external environment

Poor

Little or no discussion about any of items in this section. Minor reference to 1 to 2 items.
Fair

Some discussion, albeit general, about 3 or more items in this section tied to the case study
Good

Several section topics were discussed in well-written passages regarding the case.
Well Done

All sections that were outlined in the assignment guidelines were discussed regarding the case.
SCORE
Section 4
15 %

Analysis of the S.W.O.T. factors described in sections 1 & 2

Poor

This section was minimally developed. Vague references were made ab out the SWOT factors
Fair

1 - 2 of the S.W.O.T. factors were discussed using vague and thinly-worded references.
Good

More than 3, but not all of the SWOT factors discussed in the case were analyzed in using good writing practices
Well Done

All of the factors that were identified earlier are addressed in this section clearly and thorooughly.
SCORE



Keywords:
  • Management

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16