Skip to main content
iRubric: HCSS 1040 Communication Barriers in Clinical rubric

iRubric: HCSS 1040 Communication Barriers in Clinical rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
HCSS 1040 Communication Barriers in Clinical 
This rubric will be used to evaluate the "Communication Barriers in Clinical"
Rubric Code: RX66W4X
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Communication Barriers in Clinical
  Exceeded the Standards

4 pts

Good/Met the Standards

3 pts

Standards lacking

2 pts

Poor/Weak or non-existent

1 pts

Completion

Exceeded the Standards

Assignment is completed as required and completed as Discussion Board.
Critical thinking and concept understanding demonstrated in posts.
Confidentiality wellmaintained.
Good/Met the Standards

Assignment is turned in but not complete as required.
Concept understanding or critical thinking is demonstrated in posts.
Confidentiality maintained.
Standards lacking

Assignment is missing several elements required.
Concept understanding may be clouded with copied text from resources.
Little or no posts as directed. Confidentiality mostly maintained.
Poor/Weak or non-existent

Assignment is not completed as required.
Little concept understanding is evident.
No posts as directed. Confidentiality not maintained.
Content-Brief Description

Exceeded the Standards

Content is complete, major points are clear, questions are thoroughly answered, points are explained, defended, or proven with evidence.
Good/Met the Standards

Content is complete, major points are clear, questions are thoroughly answered, points are explained, defended, or proven, with evidence.
Standards lacking

Content is incomplete, major points are not clear, some questions not thoroughly answered, some points are not explained, defended, or proven with evidence.
Poor/Weak or non-existent

Content is incomplete, major points are not clear, questions not thoroughly answered, points are not explained, defended, or proven with evidence.
Content-What went well

Exceeded the Standards

Content is complete, major points are clear, questions are thoroughly answered, points are explained, defended, or proven with evidence.
Good/Met the Standards

Content is complete, major points are clear, questions are thoroughly answered, points are explained, defended, or proven, with evidence.
Standards lacking

Content is incomplete, major points are not clear, some questions not thoroughly answered, some points are not explained, defended, or proven with evidence.
Poor/Weak or non-existent

Content is incomplete, major points are not clear, questions not thoroughly answered, points are not explained, defended, or proven with evidence.
Content-What did not

Exceeded the Standards

Content is complete, major points are clear, questions are thoroughly answered, points are explained, defended, or proven with evidence.
Good/Met the Standards

Content is complete, major points are clear, questions are thoroughly answered, points are explained, defended, or proven, with evidence.
Standards lacking

Content is incomplete, major points are not clear, some questions not thoroughly answered, some points are not explained, defended, or proven with evidence.
Poor/Weak or non-existent

Content is incomplete, major points are not clear, questions not thoroughly answered, points are not explained, defended, or proven with evidence.
Content-What could be different

Exceeded the Standards

Content is complete, major points are clear, questions are thoroughly answered, points are explained, defended, or proven with evidence.
Good/Met the Standards

Content is complete, major points are clear, questions are thoroughly answered, points are explained, defended, or proven, with evidence.
Standards lacking

Content is incomplete, major points are not clear, some questions not thoroughly answered, some points are not explained, defended, or proven with evidence.
Poor/Weak or non-existent

Content is incomplete, major points are not clear, questions not thoroughly answered, points are not explained, defended, or proven with evidence.
Grammar, Punctuation and Spelling

Exceeded the Standards

Rules of grammar, usage and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. Language is exceptionally clear and precise.
Good/Met the Standards

Answers contain few errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Language is somewhat clear and precise.
Standards lacking

Answers contain many grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. Language lacks clarity.
Poor/Weak or non-existent

Answers contain numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.



Keywords:
  • Discussion Board Rubric







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98