Skip to main content
iRubric: Microteaching Performance Assessment rubric

iRubric: Microteaching Performance Assessment rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Microteaching Performance Assessment 
Microteaching Performance Assessment
This rubric is intended to assess the students' performance of their micro-teaching for the course ELT METHODOLOGY
Rubric Code: RX46B97
By cybersue
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Micro-teaching Lesson
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor or Missing

2 pts

Objectives and Content

Excellent

The micro-teaching class is based on a clear aim. The objectives are well described.
The content of the lesson coincides completely with the objectives.
Good

The micro-teaching class is based on an aim. The objectives are quite well described. The content of the lesson coincides with the objectives although not always clearly.
Fair

The micro-teaching class is based on an unclear aim and doesn't coincide with the activity.
Poor or Missing

The lesson is not based on an aim and the objectives were not clear.
Instructional Components

Excellent

Direct Instruction, Guided Practice, Modeling, and oral communication practice are included and effective. Guiding Questions are incorporated into lesson
Good

One of the following are missing and/or ineffective: Direct Instruction, Guided Practice, Modeling, and oral communication practice. Guiding Questions are incorporated into lesson
Fair

Two of the following areas are deficient: Content of lesson appropriate to the age, meets the objective, and is engaging for students
Poor or Missing

Three of the following areas are deficient: Content of lesson is grade level appropriate, meets the objective, and is engaging for students
Material/Props/Tools

Excellent

The material used was age appropriate and engaging for the students. It provided hands-on practice.
Good

The material used was age appropriate and engaging but didn't provide much hands-on practice.
Fair

The material used was age appropriate but not engaging for the students.
There was little or no hands-on practice.
Poor or Missing

The material used was neither age appropriate nor engaging for the students.
There was no hands-on practice.
Oral presentation and English

Excellent

The speech presents no grammatical mistakes with focus language aims.
The voice and presentation was clear at all times.
Good

There are some minor grammatical mistakes along the speech but they do not affect the focus language of the lesson. The voice and presentation was clear at all times.
Fair

There are some important grammatical mistakes which affect the aims of the lesson. The voice was hesitant or unclear at times.
Poor or Missing

The speech can not be followed because of the amount of grammatical mistakes or it was not given in English.



Keywords:
  • lesson plans, micro teaching



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16