Skip to main content
iRubric: Create Your Own Ending Group Project rubric

iRubric: Create Your Own Ending Group Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Create Your Own Ending Group Project 
Create the following assignment within your small group communities. You will have multiple class periods to work on the assignment but you will also have to assign responsibilities to individuals to complete outside of class in order to complete the assignment successfully. Each group will receive a group grade as well as an individual grade. Your assignment is to create your own ending to the novel. You will write this in the form of a script and perform it for the class at the end of the unit. As a group, you must also write a 500 word description of how your ending is supported by the rest of the novel (give at least three examples of evidence in the novel that led to your ending). You should hand in the script, the written description, a credits page detailing the significant contributions and who made them, a personal log of your own daily contributions to the group, and your individual reflection on the roles you took on within your group for group work and the performance.
Rubric Code: RX46452
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Group Work
  Needs Improvement

5 pts

Fair

10 pts

Distinctive

15 pts

Written Description

Needs Improvement

No written description is provided, or description is short with very little support from the text
Fair

Uses general support from the novel with brief or somewhat vague explanations in a fairly coherent essay
Distinctive

Detailed description of ideas and support from novel are provided in a coherent essay
Script

Needs Improvement

Spelling and grammatical errors throughout script, script is poorly thought out and lacks creativity and continuity with the text
Fair

Few spelling and grammatical errors, script shows evidence of effort and thought, shows some creativity and continuity with text
Distinctive

No spelling or grammatical errors, script shows evidence of thought provoking ideas and group discussions, script is creative and has continuity with the plot of the text
Performance

Needs Improvement

Not all group members have a role, no evidence of planning or preparation, group does not take performance seriously
Fair

Most group members have a role in the performance, shows evidence of some preparation, group takes performance seriously for the most part
Distinctive

Each group member has a role in the performance, performance shows evidence of planning and preparation, performance is creative, performance is taken seriously by group
Individual work
  Needs Improvement

1 pts

Fair

5 pts

Distinctive

10 pts

Written Reflection

Needs Improvement

Limited description of roles, does not discuss positive aspects or things you could have done better, indicates very little effort put into each role
Fair

General description of each role, mostly discusses either positive aspects or things you could have done better, but not a balance of the two, indicates limited effort put into each role
Distinctive

Brief but detailed reflection of roles that indicates both positive aspects of your roles and things you could have done better, indicates time and effort put into each role
Individual Log

Needs Improvement

Very few entries, did not contribute much to the overall product
Fair

Some entries, general descriptions of contributions
Distinctive

Many entries, detailed descriptions of contributions
Participation
  Needs Improvement

1 pts

Fair

3 pts

Distinctive

5 pts

Individual participation

Needs Improvement

Very little, if any, contributions to group discussions, exhibited a negative attitude during discussions, did not fill one of the given roles, did not have individual work completed on time
Fair

Contributed to group discussions on occasion, did not exhibit a negative attitude but did not offer much positive feedback either, completed most assignments, took on a role but did not complete all of the tasks assigned to that role
Distinctive

Actively and positively participated in group discussions and completed work on time, took on one of the given roles for the performance and for the day-to-day group work, completed all individual assignments
Group collaboration

Needs Improvement

Negative attitudes towards each other, arguing during discussions, late submissions of work, lack of preparation for final performance
Fair

Worked well together in class, but very little out-of-class work was completed to a high standard, did not communicate well to each other or to me, most work was completed on time
Distinctive

Worked well together as a group, no arguing or negative communication, allowed each person to contribute and have a part in each stage of the project, handed in all group assignments on time, took time to prepare together for final performance




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98