- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: St. Richard's Author Study Glogster rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
St. Richard's Author Study Glogster Author Study GLog Basic 4 point rubric for an author study. Rubric Code: RX35B95 By Nevenka Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Assignment Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8, 9-12

Author Study
	Outstanding 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Facts about the author	Outstanding Was able to include sufficient information about the author presented in a clear manner. (10 facts)	Good Was able to include adequate information of author. (5 facts)	Fair Was able to include some details about the author. (3 facts)	Poor Includes 1-2 details about the author. (2 facts)
Author Choice	Outstanding Includes sufficient information and details about why this author was chosen	Good Includes adequate information about why this author was chosen.	Fair Includes some details about why this author was chosen.	Poor Includes one reason why this author was chosen.
Books	Outstanding Includes more than three books written by the author	Good Includes small list of well known books. (2 books)	Fair Includes a partial list of books (1 book)	Poor Does not include list of books .
Organization	Outstanding The Glogster is neat and well organized. Everything is clear and the content is efficient.	Good Details are placed in a logical order but the way they are presented sometimes makes the writing less interesting.	Fair Some details are not in a logical order and this distracts the reader.	Poor Many details are not in a logical or expected order. Writing is not organized.
Layout	Outstanding Contains a picture of the author as well as other graphics and images related to the author and his books.	Good Mostly decorated but contains few graphics or images related to the author and his books.	Fair Has some pictures.	Poor Has no pictures
Similarities and differences /books	Outstanding Was able to present and identify similarities and differences between texts (more than 3)	Good Was able to present and identify many similarities and differences between texts (3)	Fair Was able to present and identify some similarities and differences between texts (2)	Poor Was able to present and identify one similarity and difference between texts