Skip to main content
iRubric: Grievance Processing and Arbitration Preparation rubric

iRubric: Grievance Processing and Arbitration Preparation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Grievance Processing and Arbitration Preparation 
Through the use of a grievance scenario, the student will demonstrate their comprehensive effectiveness in grievance investigation, advocacy, and arbitration preparation. This rubric measures the students ability to conduct a grievance interview; write grievances; present advocacy arguments; analyze arbitration cases; prepare an opening statement and develop direct examination questions for an arbitration hearing.
Rubric Code: RX28A9W
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Written Presentations
  Superior

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Grievance Investigation

Superior

Student demonstrates superior witness interview and contract investigation techniques. The finding of fact is thorough, complete and accurate.
Good

Student demonstrates effective witness interview and contract investigation techniques. The finding of fact is complete and accurate.
Fair

Student somewhat demonstrates effective witness interview and contract investigation techniques. The finding of fact is mostly complete and accurate.
Poor

Student does not demonstrate effective witness interview and contract investigation techniques. The finding of facts is incomplete and/or inaccurate
Grievance Writing

Superior

Student demonstrates superior grievance writing skills. The form contains all essential facts. The grievance statement is accurate; does not contain argument; and is succinctly written
Good

Student demonstrates effective grievance writing skills. The form contains all essential facts. The grievance statement is accurate; does not contain argument; and is clearly stated.
Fair

Student somewhat demonstrates effective grievance writing skills. The form contains most essential facts. The grievance statement is accurate; does not contain argument; and is clearly stated.
Poor

Student does not demonstrate effective grievance writing skills. The form lacks essential facts. The grievance statement is inaccurate; contains argument; or is ambiguous.
Arbitration Case Analyisis

Superior

Student effectively ascertains the strengths and weaknesses of an arbitration case, and can determine relative and effective strategies to overcome the weaknesses and support the strengths of the case.
Good

Student effectively ascertains the strengths and weaknesses of an arbitration case, and can determine many strategies to overcome the weaknesses and support the strengths of the case.
Fair

Student somewhat ascertains the strengths and weaknesses of an arbitration case, and can determine a few strategies to overcome the weaknesses and support the strengths of the case.
Poor

Student does not effectively ascertain the strengths and weaknesses of an arbitration case and determine strategies to overcome the weaknesses and support the strengths of the case
Opening Statement

Superior

Student presents a compelling opening statement that effectively articulates the facts of the case in a manner that captures the immediate attention of an arbitrator. Statement has order of facts.
Good

Student presents an opening statement that effectively articulates the facts of the case in a manner that captures the immediate attention of an arbitrator. Statement has order of facts.
Fair

Student somewhat presents an opening statement that mostly articulates the facts of the case in a manner that captures the immediate attention of an arbitrator. Statement has order of facts.
Poor

Student does not present an opening statement that effectively articulates the facts of the case in a manner that captures the immediate attention of an arbitrator. Statement lacks order of facts.
Direct Examination

Superior

Student demonstrates a superior, effective, and relevant line of questions. All questions are framed correctly and logically.
Good

Student demonstrates an effective and relevant line of questions. All questions are framed correctly.
Fair

Student somewhat demonstrates an effective and relevant line of questions. Most questions are framed correctly.
Poor

Student does not demonstrate an effective and relevant line of questions. Questions are poorly framed.



Keywords:
  • Grievance Processing, Arbitration Preparation







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16