Skip to main content
iRubric: Evaluative Criteria for Discussion Post rubric

iRubric: Evaluative Criteria for Discussion Post rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Evaluative Criteria for Discussion Post 
Evaluative Criteria for Research Paper
This rubric will be used to assess understanding and provide feedback on the written assignment (discussion post). Please refer to the ratings to measure performance in each category.
Rubric Code: RX23W93
By jshalon5
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Quality of Work
The discussion post submitted must reflect collegiate level critical thinking skills.
  Poor

Discussion post submitted with unacceptable content

1 pts

Minimal Work

Discussion post submitted with content meeting minimum requirements

2 pts

Good

Discussion post submitted with content meeting, and at times, exceeding assignment expectations

3 pts

Exemplary

Discussion post submitted with content that exceeds assignment expectations

4 pts

Knowledge/Comprehension

Ability to demonstrate assignment expectations
Poor

The discussion post lacks content based on the assignment's criteria.
Minimal Work

Demonstrates some understanding of the assignment criteria.

Assignment meets minimum requirements for question responses.
Good

The discussion post contains content that meets assignment criteria, with minor inaccuracies.

All questions have been answered in good detail.
Exemplary

Demonstrates a strong understanding of the assignment with relevant content and thorough, thought-provoking answers.
Ideas and Content

The extent to which the discussion post reflects the student's ability to apply cited resources.
Poor

The discussion post does not contain cited resources or supporting details to validate the written information.
Minimal Work

Contains minimum support of concepts, supporting data, and cited resources.

Ideas are vague and/or underdeveloped.
Good

Contains good analytical content with sufficient resources such as, citations, course readings, and other research data.

Ideas are clearly expressed.
Exemplary

Contains insightful and critical thinking.

Ideas are original with multiple cited sources including course readings and other research data.

Demonstrates exceptional inclusion of key points.
Adhere to Assignment Expectations

The extent to which the discussion post meets the assigned criteria
Poor

The discussion post does not include key components and lacks application of assignment criteria.
Minimal Work

Answers to questions are not completely developed.

Discussion post submitted demonstrates minimal understanding of the assignment criteria.

Insufficient details around the discussion questions.
Good

Discussion post submitted demonstrates appropriate understanding of assignment criteria.

The post is written in a detailed manner with developed thoughts.

Answers to questions are well-written and the assignment meets length requirements.
Exemplary

Discussion post submitted demonstrates exceptional understanding of the assignment criteria.

Discussion post contains exemplary content.
Written Expression and Formatting

The extent to which the discussion post uses APA formatting expectations (i.e. correct grammar, APA style).
Poor

The discussion post lacks the correct use of grammar, punctuation, and APA style formatting.
Minimal Work

Demonstrates some understanding of APA style and format.

Discussion post contains multiple grammatical and punctual errors.
Good

Good use of grammar and APA style, formatting.

Few grammatical or punctual errors.
Exemplary

Great use of grammar with sentence variety, and clear, concise thoughts.

No grammatical or punctual errors that interfere with reading.

Demonstrates scholarly writing with correct APA format.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16