Skip to main content
iRubric: FFA Conduct of Meetings rubric

iRubric: FFA Conduct of Meetings rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
FFA Conduct of Meetings 
FFA Parliamentary Procedure
Rubric Code: R3X7X2
By teamaged
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
Enter rubric description
  Poor

(N/A)

Struggling

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Striving

(N/A)

Outstanding

(N/A)

Opening and Closing Ceremonies

President
Vice President
Secretary
Treasurer
Reporter
Sentinel
Advisor
Poor

None of the officers DID NOT know their parts, and displayed moderate hesitation.

All speakers were weak.
(1 PTS.)
Struggling

1 to 2 of the officers presented their parts, and displayed hesitation.

Strength of 5 to 6 speakers were weak.
(2 PTS.)
Good

3 to 4 of the officers presented their parts, and displayed confidence.

3 to 4 speakers were weak.
(3 PTS.)
Striving

5 to 6 of the officers presented their parts, and displayed confidence.

1 to 2 speakers were weak.
(4 PTS.)
Outstanding

7 officers presented their parts, and displayed confidence.

None of the speakers were weak.
(5 PTS.)
Knowledge of Parliamentar Procedure

Use of Robert's Rules of Order
Poor

Used proper parliamentary procedure to complete 1 or zero of the abilities.

Extreme hesitation in their knowledge of parliamentary procedure.
(0-4 PTS.)
Struggling

Used proper parliamentary procedure to complete 1 of the 2 abilities.

Extreme hesitation in their knowledge of parliamentary procedure.
(5-8 PTS.)
Good

Used proper parliamentary procedure to complete 1 of the 2 abilities.

Moderate hesitation in their knowledge of parliamentary procedure.
(9-12 PTS.)
Striving

Used proper parliamentary procedure to complete BOTH of the abilities.

Moderate confidence in their knowledge of parliamentary procedure.
(13-15 PTS.)
Outstanding

Used proper parliamentary procedure to BOTH abilities.

Strong confidence in their knowledge of parliamentary procedure.
(17-20 PTS.)
Poise and Relevance

Poor

None of the items of business were discussed with poise and dignity, using proper parliamentary procedure.

None of the discussion was strong or relevant.
(2 PTS.)
Struggling

One of the two items of business were discussed with with a moderate level of poise and dignity, using proper parliamentary procedure.

Little of the discussion was strong or relevant.
(2 PTS.)
Good

One of the two items of business were discussed with poise and dignity in a businesslike manner, using proper parliamentary procedure.

A minority of the discussion was strongstrong or relevant
Striving

All of the items of business were discussed with poise and dignity in a businesslike manner, using proper parliamentary procedure.

A majority of the discussion was strong or relevant.
(4 PTS.)
Outstanding

All items of business were discussed with poise and dignity in a businesslike manner, using proper parliamentary procedure.

All discussion was strong or relevant.
(5 pts.)
Grammar and Sentence Structure

Poor

Discussion did not include clear and concise statements. The team's demonstration of their knowledge of parliamentary procedure was weak.
(1-2 PTS.)
Struggling

Little of the discussion was clear, concise and well-phrased. The team's demonstration of their knowledge of parliamentary procedure was below average.
(3-4 PTS.)
Good

Some discussion was clear, concise and well-phrased. The team's demonstration of their knowledge of parliamentary procedure was average.
(5-6 PTS.)
Striving

The majority of the discussion was clear, concise and well-phrased. The team's demonstration of their knowledge of parliamentary procedure was moderately strong.
(7-8 PTS.)
Outstanding

All discussion was clear, concise and well-phrased. The team's demonstration of their knowledge of parliamentary procedure was strong.
(9-10 PTS.)
Voice and Expression

Poor

None of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Little of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(1-2 PTS.)
Struggling

Few of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Little of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(3-4 PTS.)
Good

Some of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Some of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(5-6 PTS.)
Striving

Most of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Most of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(7-8 PTS.)
Outstanding

All team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(9-10 PTS.)
Questions

Poor

Answered 1 or zero questions correctly with significant hesitation.
(17-20 PTS.)
Struggling

Answered 2 questions correctly with significant hesitation.
(17-20 PTS.)
Good

Answered 3 questions correctly with some hesitation.
(17-20 PTS.)
Striving

Answered 4 questions correctly, with very little hesitation.
(17-20 PTS.)
Outstanding

Answered 5 (all) questions correctly, with no hesitation.
(17-20 PTS.)
Room arrangement

Poor

The team did not know how to arrange the meeting room, but they did start the meeting without direction from the judges.

(1 PT.)
Struggling

The room was NOT properly set before the start of the meeting.

The secretary DID NOT return the abilities & item of business to its original location, before leaving.

(2 PTS.)
Good

The room was NOT properly set before the start of the meeting.

The secretary returned the abilities & item of business to its original location, before leaving.

(3 PTS.)
Striving

The room was properly set before the start of the meeting.

The secretary DID NOT return the abilities & item of business to its original location, before leaving.

(4 PTS.)
Outstanding

The room was properly set before the start of the meeting.

The secretary returned the abilities & item of business to its original location, before leaving.

(5 PTS.)




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16