Skip to main content
iRubric: Revision Paper rubric

iRubric: Revision Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Revision Paper 
Revision Paper (NOT research paper)
Rubric Code: QXX49A2
By anders
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Revision essay
100 % We will assess students' ability to edit their essays.
  Inadequate

No effort exercised in the revision of this section.

(N/A)

Poor

Little effort exercised in the revision of this section. Incomplete edits.

(N/A)

Fair

Most editing suggestions were addressed, but needs more independent work.

(N/A)

Good

All editing suggestions were addressed, as wells as a new attention to revisions.

(N/A)

Excellent

Essay revised completely

(N/A)

Unity

All off topic material is removed or edited; transitions added; more relevant material provided
Inadequate

No unity errors were addressed. Consistent off topic, vague, repetitive material. Examples do not support main idea.
Poor

Only one or two unity errors are addressed. More examples or explanations needed.
Fair

Three to five unity errors are addressed and corrections are attempted. One or two transitions are added.
Good

All unity errors are corrected. Transitions and joining ideas are added where needed.
Excellent

All Unity errors are addressed and corrected. More connecting ideas, non-rpt transitions, and clearer examples added to each supporting paragraph. Introduction is much improved.
Syntax and Grammar

Revision of colloquialisms, jargon, awkwards word choice, and grammatical errors.
Inadequate

Little to no changes were made to mistakes addressed in the original submission.
Poor

One to two changes were made to mistakes in the original submission. The changes that were made affected the fluidity/understanding of the sentence/paragraph.
Fair

3-5 changes were addressed, but a few mistakes remain in: grammar, wc, colloq., jargon
Good

All errors were addressed and corrected.
Excellent

All errors are addressed and corrected. Sentences are rephrased, re-arranged, often split up or joined for coherence. Sentence variety is used through the essay.
Thesis Statement

All problems with original thesis have been edited.
Inadequate

Thesis remains unclear and/or incomplete. Does not address all parts of the prompt. No edits were made.
Poor

A small effort was made to clarify thesis, but it still fails to present a single, clear argument.
Fair

Thesis is not one sentence, but still produces a single, clear argument which addresses all parts of the prompt.
Good

Thesis focuses on a single, clear argument and addresses all parts of the prompt.
Excellent

Thesis is clear, focused, and placed in its traditional place. Clear transitions connect it to the introduction paragraph and help reader anticipate the essay that follows.
Organization & Coherence

Clear and specific topic sentences, appropriate organization of topics according to thesis, strong introduction and conclusion.
Inadequate

No identifiable topic sentences. Paragraphs and evidence are not presented in the order addressed in the thesis statement.
No clear method of organization used.
Poor

Few changes were made to topic sentences, but paragraphs and evidence are not presented in the order addressed in the thesis statement. Order of ideas makes little sense.
Fair

Changes were made to topic sentences and the order of paragraphs may have been edited, but there exists an excess/lack of evidence to support the thesis statement.
Good

Topic sentences are clear and specific and the order of paragraphs corresponds with the arguments presented in the thesis statement.
Excellent

All ideas are organized clearly, using a clear method of organization that reinforces the rhetorical strategy the essay follows. Clear transitional words & phrases are used logically. Order of ideas helps the essay flow seamlessly and easily.
Development

Logical, specific, relevant and adequate support for each main idea.
Inadequate

No developmental errors are corrected. Essay remains underdeveloped or inadequately supported.
Poor

One change was made in supporting paragraphs to provide adequate development
Fair

three or four changes were made in supporting paragraphs to address errors in development. Most supporting ideas are vague / rpt.
Good

All suggested changes are made to address problems in development.
Excellent

Changes in development were made throughout the essay, not just in supporting paragraphs. No vague or rpt ideas used. All ideas are clear and logically connected.



Keywords:
  • revising, editing, writing

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16