Skip to main content
iRubric: Honors Theatre III Acting Test rubric

iRubric: Honors Theatre III Acting Test rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Honors Theatre III Acting Test 
This is the rubric for the Honors Theatre III Acting Test. Students are assigned a random partner and given a who, what, and where. Students must create a scene based on those circumstances and present them for a test grade.
Rubric Code: QX6924X
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Honors Acting Test Theatre III
  Poor

0 pts

Fair

1 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Rehearsal Time (Shared Grade)

Poor

>Students did not use their rehearsal time effectively.
>Most of the time was spent talking or doing work not pertaining to the assignment.
>Students did not physically rehearse.
Fair

>The majority of the time was spent off-task.
>Students did not spend any of their time physically rehearsing, but instead sat and talked about it only.
Good

>The majority of the time was spent on-task.
>Students had some difficulty staying together and rehearsing the entire time.
>Some time was spent physically rehearsing.
Excellent

>Students spent the entire time rehearsing and staying on-task.
>Students spent the majority of the time physically working through their scene and improving upon it.
Voice & Articulation

Poor

>Student could not be heard. Voice was too low and quiet to be understood.
>Student did not practice good articulation and slurred most of their words, making them not understandable.
>Student was very monotone and did not use pitch changes or inflection.
Fair

>Student could hardly be heard. The audience had to strain to hear them.
>Student also mumbled/did not use very good articulation, making them hard to follow.
>Student rarely changed their pitch or utilized inflection.
Good

>Student was able to be heard the majority of the time, but still had trouble projecting in the full space.
>Student spoke clearly and with a moderate tempo, but did slur a few words.
Excellent

>Student was heard and understood clearly, with no trouble from the audience.
>Every word was clear and articulated, and their voice filled the entire performance space.
Movement

Poor

>The student utilized no movement during their scene, relying instead on sitting or standing with no gestures.
>They spent most of their time with their back to the audience.
Fair

>The student utilized minimum movement in their scene.
>Most of the scene consisted of sitting or standing with little to no gestures.
>They had their back to the audience often.
Good

>The student moved in the space and utilized pantomime and gestures to indicate the area around them.
>However, many of their movements were not specific or clear.
>They were open to the audience most of the time.
Excellent

>The student exhibited clear, concise movements with their scene.
>Their movements appeared rehearsed and controlled.
>They used pantomime and gestures to indicate space.
>They stayed open to the audience the entire time.
Character-Who

Poor

>The student did not attempt to communicate their character to the audience.
>The student did not attempt to communicate their relationship to their partner.
Fair

>The student had a character in mind, but had trouble communicating it to the audience.
>The student had trouble communicating the relationship between themselves and their partner.
Good

>The student had a character created for their scene, but did not use original methods to communicate it. (i.e. showing vs. telling)
>The student had a clear relationship with their partner, but did not use original methods to communicate it. (i.e. showing vs. telling)
Excellent

>The student had a character for their scene and communicated it to the audience in an original way.
>The student had a clear relationship with their partner and communicated it to the audience in an original way.
Location-Where

Poor

>The students made no attempt to inform the audience of their location.
Fair

>The students made limited attempts to inform the audience of their location.
>The students forgot about their location after the beginning of the scene.
Good

>The students made an attempt to communicate their location to the audience, but did not do so in an original way (i.e. showing vs. telling).
>Many times, the students forgot about their location after the beginning of the scene.
Excellent

>The students clearly showed their location to the audience in an original way.
>The students maintained the location of their scene throughout the scene.
Plot-What (Shared Grade)

Poor

>The students' scene had no beginning, middle, or end.
>Students seemed to not know what was going on.
>Complete lack of planning.
Fair

>Students were able to convey a general plot, but were still missing a clear beginning, middle, or end.
>Appeared to have some thought with what they were doing, but was not fully made apparent.
Good

>Students created a clear beginning, middle, and end, but did not appear to have thought it through.
>Students seemed unsure at times as to what to do next.
Excellent

>Students had a clear beginning, middle, and end.
>Showed clear, concise thinking with the creation of the plot.
>Students seemed to be aware the entire time of where the scene was going.



Keywords:
  • theatre, drama, test, acting, improvisation, improv, scene, evaluation, honors

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98