- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Reflection Paper ATH4M rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Reflection Paper ATH4M Reflection Paper Y395 Final written exam for ATH4M, reflection paper based on experiences, opinions and opportunities obtained over the semester. Rubric Code: QX5W885 By sssdance Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Dance Type: Exam Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Reflection
	Level 4 (N/A)	Level 3 (N/A)	Level 2 (N/A)	Level 1 (N/A)
Knowledge/Understanding	Level 4 Discussed in great detail how history, society and the time period affected the researched company's choreographic style.	Level 3 Discussed in detail how history, society and the time period affected the researched company's choreographic style.	Level 2 Discussed in little to no detail how history, society and the time period affected the researched company's choreographic style.	Level 1 Did not discuss how history, society and the time period affected the researched company's choreographic style.
Thinking	Level 4 Explained in great detail how he/she has grown as a dance artist by identifying 3 new things that he/she has learned and/or observed about themselves over the duration of the semester.	Level 3 Explained in detail how he/she has grown as a dance artist by identifying 2 new things that he/she has learned and/or observed about themselves over the duration of the semester.	Level 2 Explained in little to no detail how he/she has grown as a dance artist by identifying 1 new thing that he/she has learned and/or observed about themselves over the duration of the semester.	Level 1 Did not explain how he/she has grown as a dance artist by identifying no new things that he/she has learned and/or observed about themselves over the duration of the semester.
Communication	Level 4 Discussed the value of his/her project by providing numerous opinions/suggestions about specific or general elements of the course.	Level 3 Discussed the value of his/her project by providing some opinions/suggestions about specific or general elements of the course.	Level 2 Discussed the value of his/her project by providing little opinions/suggestions about specific or general elements of the course.	Level 1 Did not discuss the value of his/her project by providing no opinions/suggestions about specific or general elements of the course.