- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Project Proposal Grading Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Project Proposal Grading Rubric Develop a grading rubric tailored specifically to your Course Project that will evaluate your project. The rubric that you develop must: Rubric Code: QX394A4 By jasmine1994 Draft Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Project Proposal Enter rubric description
	Good (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Poor (N/A)
Statement of purpose 20 %	Good Purpose of accomplishing project was clearly stated with great ideas. The student gave multiple reasons why the purpose was chosen. Identification of the	Fair Not enough ideas about the project purpose, but the audience and format were provided.	Poor No statement given, no audience mentioned, and no format in the project.
Rationale 20 %	Good Explanation about choosing the project and how it fits into the education area were provided in detailed sentences.	Fair Statement of why they have chosen the project was included, but lack of information on how the title will fit into the education area.	Poor Statement of the project was not mentioned. The project fitting into the education area did not have anything to do with the topic of the project.
Research Base 30 %	Good 3 to 5 scholarly journals, books, and articles were identified. Questions were answered correctly in detailed sentences. Citations and references were submitted in APA format.	Fair Only 1 or 2 scholarly journals, book, and articles were found in the project. Half of the questions were answered correctly. Missing 1 or more APA citation or reference	Poor Scholarly journals, books, and articles were not mentioned. Lack of information pertaining to the questions given to answer about the project. No APA citations or references
Projected Application 15 %	Good Explanation of using the project after completion was explained. Integration was stated for classroom or school use. Benefits were identified for other teachers or schools to use.	Fair Missing information on how the project will be integrated into the school and how teachers would benefit would benefit from it.	Poor Failed to answer the questions about the project application.
Description of the project outcome 15 %	Good 3 to 5 outcomes were mentioned in the project. The student stated their results of implementation for the project.	Fair Only 1 outcome was identified in the project for the results of the project implementation.	Poor No outcome were given. No explanation of implementation in the project.