Skip to main content
iRubric: Assignment Rubric IPS Theologies of Suffering

iRubric: Assignment Rubric IPS Theologies of Suffering

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Assignment Rubric IPS Theologies of Suffering 
Assignment Rubric IPS Theologies of Suffering
This will serve as the rubric for grading the assignments for the Theologies of Suffering course.
Rubric Code: QX2X46X
By chapsieg
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Criterion
100 %
  Unacceptable

Student will receive 0 points for this section of the assignment

0 pts

Fair

Grade C-

70 pts

Acceptable

Grade B-

80 pts

Very Good

Grade A-

90 pts

Excellent

Grade A

100 pts

Content
20 pts

How well do you use course resources in your assignment?
Unacceptable

- Content is incomplete.
-Source material is not used.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
Fair

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Use of source material is ok but does not address course concepts.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Acceptable

- Good use of source material but could be strengthened.
- Use of source material is good but does not fully address course concepts.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Very Good

- Very good use of source material
- Use of source material is very good and addresses course concepts.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Excellent

Excellent engagement of the course materials. The student provides a thorough analysis of the topics in a manner which greatly exceeds expectations.
Development
20 pts

How well do you explain and support your conclusions?
Unacceptable

-Source material is not adequately analyzed.
-Major points and conclusions are not addressed.
Fair

- Understanding of course material is not fully demonstrated.
- Major points and conclusions are addressed, but not well supported.
Acceptable

-Understanding of the material is not always clearly demonstrated.
- Major points and conclusions are not always stated clearly and are not always well supported by source material.
Very Good

-Understanding of the material is clearly demonstrated.
- Major points and conclusions are stated clearly and are well supported by source material.
Excellent

All conclusions are well developed and supported by course material and lived experience. Positions are well articulated. The student demonstrates excellent critical thinking skills.
Application
20 pts

Do you connect the theological concepts to your ministry setting or life experience?
Unacceptable

Lacks a connection between concepts in resource material and ministry or life experience.
Fair

Weak development of the connection between the source material and ministry.
Acceptable

Able to demonstrate a good working knowledge of the concepts and but does not clearly shows their application to ministry and life through concrete examples.
Very Good

Able to demonstrate an excellent working knowledge of the concepts and clearly shows their application to ministry and life through concrete examples.
Excellent

Inclusion of life and/or ministerial experience is fully integrated into the assignment and greatly enhances the assignment.
Concepts
10 pts

How well do you define and use theological concepts?
Unacceptable

Theological concepts are neither defined nor used correctly.
Fair

Theological concepts are either not defined or not used correctly.
Acceptable

Theological concepts are not expressed as clearly as they ought.
Very Good

Theological concepts are expressed clearly and used correctly
Excellent

The student defines the concepts through example or citation and uses concepts consistently correctly.
Thoroughness
10 pts

Do you complete all aspects of the assignment?
Unacceptable

Assignment not adequately completed.
Fair

Not all aspects of the assignment are completed thoroughly.
Acceptable

Most aspects of the assignment are completed but some aspects are weak or not fully developed or too wordy.
Very Good

All aspects of the assignment are completed. Assignment is substantial yet succinct.
Excellent

The student is thorough is responding to all aspects of the assignment in a way that is complete yet succinct.
Organization & Structure
10 pts

Does your writing style enhance or detract from your assignment?
Unacceptable

- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
- Word count way above or below range.
Fair

- Structure of the assignment is not easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.
- Word count either above or below range.
Acceptable

- The structure and organization of the assignment are good but could be strengthened to increase the impact of the assignment.
- Word count within range.
Very Good

- Structure of the assignment is clear and easy to follow.
- The assignments is enhances by the organization and structure.
- Word count within range.
Excellent

The assignment is written in a style which greatly enhances understanding, flow and readability. Student demonstrates excellent writing ability.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
10 pts

Do you consistently adhere to Loyola writing policies?
Unacceptable

- Assignment contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Assignment does not use proper citations.
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Fair

- Assignment contains several grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Proper citations are used most but not all the time.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Acceptable

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are usually followed; spelling is correct.
- Proper citations are used.
- Language is usually clear and precise; sentences usually display consistently strong, varied structure.
Very Good

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Proper citations are used.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Excellent

There are no spelling, grammar or citation errors.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98