Skip to main content
iRubric: English 101 Essay Rubric

iRubric: English 101 Essay Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
English 101 Essay Rubric 
Rubric Code: Q23AC97
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Essay Evaluation
  Failing

(N/A)

Inadequate

(N/A)

Adequate

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Superior

(N/A)

Ideas
25 %

Failing

* Does not respond to assignment
* Lacks clear central idea
* Details are nonexistent
Inadequate

* Only responds to the assignment superficially
* Lacks clear central idea
* Thesis is too vague or obvious to be developed effectively
* The paper is very repetitive.
Adequate

* An adequate paper, but the writer's topic is not fully defined
* Presents central idea in general terms, but depends
on platitudes or cliches; does not ackowledge other views
* Shows basic comprehension of question and sources
* Details are limited and there is no in-depth explanation
* The paper is somewhat repetitive
Good

* A solid paper. The writer's position on the argument is clear, but may have minor lapses in development.
* Demonstrates understanding of the question and sources, but may handle the idea in a less sophisticated and effective way
Superior

*Interesting, ideas are very clear and are full of originality and strength
* Central idea is stated clearly, worth developing, and limited enough to be manageable
* Demonstrates clear understanding of question and sources
Organization and Coherence
25 %

Failing

*The essay lacks clear organization and coherence
* The introduction and conclusion are not clearly written
* The writer uses no transitions
Inadequate

* The writer tries to organize ideas into paragraphs, but they may lack internal coherence, not have topic setences, or not relate to the essay's central idea
* The introduction and conclusion are not clearly written
* The writer uses few or innapropriate transitions
Adequate

* Organization is present but overly simple
* Paragraphs contain topic sentences and may relate to central idea but logic is not always clear
* The introduction and conclusion are present but not adequately effective
* May use transitions, but they are not logic based
Good

* Organization shows logical progression of ideas
* Some logical links may be faulty, but each paragraph clearly relates to the central idea
* Paragraphs are reasonably unified
* The introduction draws the reader in and the conclusion wraps up the story
* Clear transitions connect ideas
Superior

* Uses effective logical organization appropriate to paper's subject, purpose, audience, and thesis. Guides the reader through the chain of reasoning or progression of ideas.
* Clear topic sentences develop one idea from the previous one or identify their logical relations.
* Sophisticated use of transitions
Support
20 %

Failing

* The writing is boring and too brief to catch the reader's attention
*Uses irrelevant details or lacks supporting evidence entirely
Inadequate

* The writer depends on cliches or overgeneralization for support, or offers little evidence of any kind
* May be a personal narrative rather than an essay or summary rather than analysis
Adequate

* The writing is somewhat interesting but does little to catch the reader's attention
* The writer tries to have an individual voice, but lacks creativity
*Uses generalizations to support points. May use examples, but they are obvious or irrelevant
* Depends on unsupported opinion or personal experience, or assumes that evidence speaks for itself and needs no application to the point being discussed
* Fails to offer support when needed
Good

*The writer includes several interesting parts that keep the reader's attention.
* The writer's tone catches the reader's interest and connects with the reader
* Offers reasons to support points, using varied kinds of evidence, but the evidence may need further evaluation or qualification
*Examples support thesis, but connections between evidence and main ideas may need clarifying
Superior

* Uses evidence appropriately and effectively, providing sufficient evidence and explanation to convince
* Logic is always clear and defensible
Style
15 %

Failing

* Contains many awkward sentences, misuses words, and/or uses innapropriate language
* Essay is vague and abstract
Inadequate

* The writer uses few vivid verbs and adjectives.
* Contains several awkward or ungrammatical sentences, or sentence structure, though "correct," is simple or repetitive
* Contains numerous unintegrated or "dropped" quotes
Adequate

* The writer uses some vivid verbs and adjectives
*Range of word choice is limited, unprecise or repetitive. Relies on cliches or uses inappropriate langauge.
*Sentence structure is generally correct, but sentences may be wordy, unfocused, repetitive, or confusing.
* Integration of quotes is weak
Good

* The writer's good use of verbs and adjectives helps the essay
* Generally uses words accurately and effectively, but may sometimes be too general.
* Sentences are generally clear, well structured, focused, though a few may be awkward or ineffective.
* Most quotes are well integrated
Superior

* The writer's vivid use of verbs and adjectives animates the essay
* Chooses words for their precise meanings and uses an appropriate level of specificity and sophistication
Mechanics
15 %

Failing

* Contains so many errors that is is impossible for the reader to follow the logic of the essay
Inadequate

* Contains either many mechanical errors or a few important errors that block the reader's understanding
* Format is
innapropriate or may indicate neglect or misreading of instructions
Adequate

* Contains several mechanical errors, including format and/or citation, which may temporarily confuse the reader but not impede overall understanding
Good

* Contains a few errors, which the reader may notice but they do not interfere with understanding
* Format and citation are substantially correct
Superior

* Almost entirely free of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors. *Observes all applicable format and citation conventions.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16