Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Album/Book Persuasive Essaay rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Album/Book Persuasive Essaay
AP Argument Rubric (BEST)
Rubric Code:
PXA4W2B
By
tjenkins1983
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
AP Argument Rubric
Meets Expectations
100/50/25
4 pts
Developing
96/48/24
3 pts
Needs Improvement
86/43/21
2 pts
Below Expectation
72/36/18
1 pts
Introduction
Meets Expectations
Introduction is skillfully written to engage the audience and make them receptive. Topic is clearly understood and addressed in a sophisticated manner. The central claim is well crafted, clearly stated, argumentative in nature, and clearly defends, challenges, or qualifies the issue at hand in a more eloquent fashion than an 3 response. All necessary background information is included.
Developing
Introduction is well written and engages the audience and makes them receptive. Topic is clearly understood and addressed in an original manner. The central claim is well crafted, clearly stated, argumentative in nature, and clearly defends, challenges, or qualifies the issue at hand. Most necessary background information is included.
Needs Improvement
Introduction attempts to engage the audience and/or make them receptive. Topic is mostly understood and addressed. The central claim takes a position that defends, challenges, or qualifies the issue at hand but may awkward. Some background information is included.
Below Expectation
Attempt to engage the audience awkward or vague. Topic is somewhat misunderstood but partially addressed. The central claim is inappropriate, weak, or unclear. No background information.
Development of Argument
Meets Expectations
Reasons and evidence are astute, sophisticated, persuasive, and poignantly relevant, drawing on their reading, observations, past studies or experiences.
The analysis shows keen insight and eloquently contributes to the persuasiveness of the argument.
Argument is fully developed and is overwhelmingly effective at supporting the central claim.
Developing
Reasons and evidence are persuasive, and relevant, drawing on their reading, observations, past studies or experiences.
The analysis shows grade appropriate insight and for the most part contributes to the persuasiveness of the argument.
Argument is developed for the most part and effective at supporting the central claim.
Needs Improvement
Reasons and evidence are somewhat persuasive and relevant, drawing on their reading, observations, past studies or experiences.
The analysis is limited.
Argument does a fairly adequate job of supporting the central claim.
Below Expectation
Argument is flawed or illogical. Reasons are mostly irrelevant and little evidence is used to support them.
The analysis is overly simplistic or wrong, if present.
Conclusion
Meets Expectations
Makes a sophisticated and eloquent summary of the arguments.
Arouses a sense of relevance for the topic and motivates the audience to fully adopt your beliefs about the pairing.
Elevated by expert use of emotional appeals.
Developing
Makes a sophisticated summary of the arguments.
Arouses a sense of relevance for the topic and motivates the audience to consider your beliefs about the pairing.
Effective use of emotional appeals
Needs Improvement
Clearly summarizes the arguments and reinforces the thesis.
Motivates the audience to acknowledge your beliefs about the pairing.
Makes a limited attempt to utilize emotional appeals.
Below Expectation
Summary of the arguments is limited.
Awkward tie back to thesis.
Ineffective attempt to appeal to audience in any fashion.
Organization
Meets Expectations
Clearly and purposefully ordered arguments (per paragraph)
Follows outline structure exactly
Effective, topic sentences that fully illustrate the argument presented in the paragraph
Body paragraphs incorporate a good proof/ analysis ratio (more analysis than cited information)
Sophisticated use of transitions connects the ideas within AND between paragraphs
Developing
Organization enhances meaning, while the order isn't blatantly purposeful.
Mostly follows outline structure
Topic sentences fairly illustrate the argument presented in the paragraph
Body paragraphs somewhat incorporate a good proof/ analysis ratio (more analysis than cited information)
Effective use of transitions connects the ideas between paragraphs
Needs Improvement
Mostly focused. Development of ideas is somewhat effective.
Somewhat follows outline structure
Topic sentences do not clearly illustrate the argument presented in the paragraph
Body paragraphs scarcely incorporate a good proof/ analysis ratio (more analysis than cited information)
Transitions are used however they are elementary in nature or randomly placed.
Below Expectation
Inconsistent focus. Development of ideas is somewhat ineffective.
Does not follow outline structure
Topic sentences are missing
Body paragraphs do not incorporate a good proof/ analysis ratio (more analysis than cited information)
Transitions are limited or missing
Style and Voice
Meets Expectations
Sophisticated sense of audience.
Consistently conveys a highly academic tone, always addressing both hostile and receptive audiences with respect.
Skillfully asserts authority on the topic.
Developing
Effective sense of audience.
Conveys a highly academic tone, addressing both hostile and receptive audiences with respect for the most part.
Asserts authority on the topic.
Needs Improvement
Somewhat understands the audience.
Somewhat conveys an academic and respectful tone.
Does little to come across as an authority on the topic.
Below Expectation
Makes an attempt to understand the audience.
Tone is elementary/informal and/or inconsistent.
Does not come across as an authority on the topic.
Grammar/ Mechanics
Meets Expectations
Essay contains one or two errors
Developing
Essay contains a few errors, but they are not distracting to the reader
Needs Improvement
Essay contains several errors, most are not distracting to the reader
Below Expectation
The overall presentation of the essay displays a lack of proofreading and attention to detail. While the essay MIGHT be readable, it is uncomfortable and unprofessional.
Works Cited
Meets Expectations
All sources are cited in- text in the correct MLA format and accounted for on the work cited page
Developing
Most sources are cited in- text in the correct MLA format and accounted for on the work cited page
Needs Improvement
Only one in-text citation
AND/OR
Work cited page not complete or formatted properly.
Below Expectation
NO citations and/or work cited page
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.